vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INNEOVA Holdings Ltd (INEO) and RHYTHM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (RYTM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RHYTHM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($57.3M vs $30.8M, roughly 1.9× INNEOVA Holdings Ltd). INNEOVA Holdings Ltd runs the higher net margin — 0.8% vs -83.0%, a 83.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Rhythm Pharmaceuticals is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on developing and commercializing targeted therapies for rare genetic disorders causing severe unmanageable obesity, including POMC deficiency, LEPR deficiency, and Bardet-Biedl syndrome. It serves patients in North America and Europe who lack effective standard treatments for their chronic life-altering conditions.
INEO vs RYTM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $30.8M | $57.3M |
| Net Profit | $243.0K | $-47.5M |
| Gross Margin | 19.3% | 91.6% |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | -82.2% |
| Net Margin | 0.8% | -83.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 36.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -9.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $-0.73 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $57.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $51.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.8M | $48.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $32.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $41.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $33.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $26.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-47.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-52.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $243.0K | $-46.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-49.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-43.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-43.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-32.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-141.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 91.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 89.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 88.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 88.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 90.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 88.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 89.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 89.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | -82.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -102.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | -93.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -143.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -98.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -132.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -139.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -538.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -83.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -103.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | -96.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -151.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -103.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -131.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -110.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -544.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.73 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.82 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.02 | $-0.75 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.73 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.55 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.1M | $388.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.2M | $139.1M |
| Total Assets | $52.6M | $480.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.26× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $388.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $416.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $291.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $314.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $320.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $298.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $319.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $201.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $139.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $148.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.2M | $-11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $39.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $61.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $480.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $506.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.6M | $372.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $386.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $392.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $363.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $381.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $258.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-301.0K | $-25.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -4.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -1.24× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-25.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-26.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-301.0K | $-23.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-40.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-29.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-40.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.24× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
