vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INNEOVA Holdings Ltd (INEO) and TELOS CORP (TLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TELOS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($46.8M vs $30.8M, roughly 1.5× INNEOVA Holdings Ltd). INNEOVA Holdings Ltd runs the higher net margin — 0.8% vs -34.9%, a 35.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. TELOS CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.0M vs $-1.5M).
Telos Corporation is an information technology and cybersecurity company located in Ashburn, Virginia. Telos primarily serves government and enterprise clients, receiving a large number of its contracts from the United States Department of Defense. Customers are primarily military, intelligence and civilian agencies of the US government and NATO allies.
INEO vs TLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $30.8M | $46.8M |
| Net Profit | $243.0K | $-16.3M |
| Gross Margin | 19.3% | 35.0% |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | -39.6% |
| Net Margin | 0.8% | -34.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 77.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -74.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $-0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $46.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.8M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $30.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $26.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $23.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $28.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $29.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $243.0K | $-9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-8.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-9.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-28.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-7.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-7.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 33.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 40.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 37.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -39.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | -27.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -29.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -37.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -121.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -30.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -28.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -34.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | -26.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -28.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -35.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -118.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -27.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -24.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.02 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.39 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.1M | $53.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.2M | $96.0M |
| Total Assets | $52.6M | $139.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.26× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $53.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $59.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $57.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $57.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $54.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $80.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $93.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $96.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $119.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.2M | $118.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $126.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $127.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $129.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $149.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $154.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $139.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $164.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.6M | $165.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $158.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $158.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $182.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $195.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-301.0K | $8.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.5M | $8.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -4.8% | 17.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -1.24× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $29.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-301.0K | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-10.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-350.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-8.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-447.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.8% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -47.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -30.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -28.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.24× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
INEO
Segment breakdown not available.
TLS
| Security Solutions Segment | $44.8M | 96% |
| Secure Networks Segment | $1.9M | 4% |
