vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ingram Micro Holding Corp (INGM) and RYDER SYSTEM INC (R). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ingram Micro Holding Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.0B vs $3.1B, roughly 4.5× RYDER SYSTEM INC). RYDER SYSTEM INC runs the higher net margin — 3.0% vs 0.7%, a 2.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ingram Micro Holding Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.7% vs 1.0%). RYDER SYSTEM INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($273.0M vs $-962.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Ingram Micro Holding Corp's revenue compounded faster (11.0% CAGR vs -0.9%).
Ingram Micro Holding Corporation is an American distributor of information technology products and services. The company is based in Irvine, California, U.S. and has operations around the world. Founded as Micro D, Inc in 1979 in California by Geza Czige and Lorraine Mecca, the company, originally a traditional distributor focused on marketing, selling and shipping vendor products to resellers, is currently specializing on becoming a platform-based business that focuses on its digital experie...
Ryder System, Inc. is an American transportation and logistics company, specializing in truck rental and leasing, fleet management, supply chain management, and transportation management. It also offers full-service leasing, rental and maintenance, used vehicle sales, transportation management, professional drivers, e-commerce fulfillment, and last-mile delivery services. The company is headquartered in Coral Gables, Florida, and operates in the United States and United Kingdom.
INGM vs R — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.0B | $3.1B |
| Net Profit | $98.9M | $93.0M |
| Gross Margin | 6.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.7% | 3.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.7% | 1.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 42.9% | -5.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.68 | $2.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $14.0B | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.9B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.6B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.8B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.3B | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | $98.9M | $93.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $121.4M | $132.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.5M | $138.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.8M | $131.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.2M | $98.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $135.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.0M | $142.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.6M | $127.0M |
| Q1 26 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | 0.7% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 4.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.68 | $2.34 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.52 | $3.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.42 | $3.32 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.16 | $3.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | $2.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.35 | $3.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | $2.84 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $916.0M | $182.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.3B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.2B | $2.9B |
| Total Assets | $20.9B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.79× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $916.0M | $182.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $198.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $802.6M | $189.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $856.7M | $180.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $881.6M | $151.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $154.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $849.5M | $162.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $164.0M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $7.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $6.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.8B | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.5B |
| Q1 26 | $4.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $3.1B |
| Q1 26 | $20.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.2B | $16.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.2B | $16.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.5B | $16.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.6B | $16.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $16.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.6B | $16.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $16.4B |
| Q1 26 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.75× | 2.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.93× | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.92× | 2.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.90× | 2.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.06× | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.09× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $583.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-962.3M | $273.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.9% | 8.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | 13.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 6.27× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $53.2M | $595.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $583.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $749.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-146.0M | $442.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-298.0M | $752.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-200.4M | $651.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $558.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-277.0M | $629.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $552.0M |
| Q1 26 | $-962.3M | $273.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $344.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-175.0M | $-85.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-333.2M | $63.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-230.2M | $137.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-201.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-315.0M | $30.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-87.0M |
| Q1 26 | -6.9% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.2% | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.4% | -2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.9% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.7% |
| Q1 26 | 0.3% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 12.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | 21.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 16.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.27× | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.85× | 5.67× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.47× | 3.20× | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.88× | 5.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.90× | 6.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.60× | 4.43× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.35× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
INGM
Segment breakdown not available.
R
| Fleet Management Solutions | $1.5B | 47% |
| ChoiceLease | $878.0M | 28% |
| Dedicated Transportation Solutions | $553.0M | 18% |
| Commercial rental | $211.0M | 7% |
