vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ingredion Inc (INGR) and LINCOLN ELECTRIC HOLDINGS INC (LECO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ingredion Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.6× LINCOLN ELECTRIC HOLDINGS INC). LINCOLN ELECTRIC HOLDINGS INC runs the higher net margin — 12.2% vs 9.5%, a 2.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LINCOLN ELECTRIC HOLDINGS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.7% vs -2.4%). Ingredion Inc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($270.0M vs $63.0M). Over the past eight quarters, LINCOLN ELECTRIC HOLDINGS INC's revenue compounded faster (4.8% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Ingredion Inc. is an American food and beverage ingredient provider based in Westchester, Illinois, producing mainly starches, non-GMO sweeteners, stevia, and pea protein. The company turns corn, tapioca, potatoes, plant-based stevia, grains, fruits, gums and other vegetables into ingredients for the food, beverage, brewing, and pharmaceutical industries and numerous industrial sectors. It has about 12,000 employees in 44 locations, and customers in excess of 120 countries.
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. is an American multinational and global manufacturer of welding products, arc welding equipment, welding accessories, plasma and oxy-fuel cutting equipment and robotic welding systems headquartered in Euclid, Ohio. It has a network of distributors and sales offices covering more than 160 countries and 42 manufacturing locations in North America, Europe, the Middle East, Asia and Latin America. It also operates manufacturing alliances and joint ventures in 19 co...
INGR vs LECO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $167.0M | $136.4M |
| Gross Margin | 24.5% | 35.6% |
| Operating Margin | 12.5% | 16.6% |
| Net Margin | 9.5% | 12.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.4% | 11.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 72.2% | 15.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.58 | $2.47 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $983.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $136.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $167.0M | $136.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $171.0M | $122.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $196.0M | $143.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.0M | $118.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $97.0M | $140.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $188.0M | $100.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.0M | $101.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 35.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.5% | 34.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.1% | 36.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.0% | 37.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.7% | 36.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.9% | 36.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.6% | 35.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.7% | 37.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.5% | 17.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.7% | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | 16.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.0% | 17.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.3% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.8% | 14.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.5% | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.9% | 11.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 13.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | 10.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.47 | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.58 | $2.45 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.61 | $2.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.99 | $2.56 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.00 | $2.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.43 | $2.47 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.83 | $1.77 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.22 | $1.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.0B | $298.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.3B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $7.9B | $3.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.87× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $298.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $308.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $915.0M | $293.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $861.0M | $299.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $837.0M | $394.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $997.0M | $377.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $877.0M | $404.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $505.0M | $272.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7B | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.9B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.8B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.8B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5B | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $3.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $405.0M | $102.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $270.0M | $63.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.4% | 5.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.7% | 3.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.43× | 0.75× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $511.0M | $438.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $102.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $405.0M | $95.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $277.0M | $236.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $185.0M | $143.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.0M | $185.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.0M | $95.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $479.0M | $199.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $312.0M | $170.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $63.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $270.0M | $52.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $172.0M | $205.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.0M | $118.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-15.0M | $158.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $311.0M | $64.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $429.0M | $163.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $257.0M | $147.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.5% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 10.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.8% | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.3% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.9% | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.7% | 14.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.5% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.9% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.7% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 2.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.43× | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.62× | 1.93× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.94× | 1.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.39× | 1.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.49× | 0.68× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.55× | 1.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.11× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
INGR
| Food And Industrial Ingredients LATAM Segment | $599.0M | 34% |
| Texture And Healthful Solutions Segment | $598.0M | 34% |
| Food And Industrial Ingredients U.S.Canada Segment | $486.0M | 28% |
| Other | $74.0M | 4% |
LECO
Segment breakdown not available.
