vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Ingredion Inc (INGR) and Lamb Weston (LW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Ingredion Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.6B, roughly 1.1× Lamb Weston). Ingredion Inc runs the higher net margin — 9.5% vs 3.5%, a 6.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Lamb Weston posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.9% vs -2.4%). Ingredion Inc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($270.0M vs $-36.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Lamb Weston's revenue compounded faster (-1.5% CAGR vs -3.4%).

Ingredion Inc. is an American food and beverage ingredient provider based in Westchester, Illinois, producing mainly starches, non-GMO sweeteners, stevia, and pea protein. The company turns corn, tapioca, potatoes, plant-based stevia, grains, fruits, gums and other vegetables into ingredients for the food, beverage, brewing, and pharmaceutical industries and numerous industrial sectors. It has about 12,000 employees in 44 locations, and customers in excess of 120 countries.

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. is an American food processing company that is one of the world's largest producers and processors of frozen french fries, waffle fries, and other frozen potato products. It is headquartered in Eagle, Idaho, a suburb of Boise.

INGR vs LW — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
INGR
INGR
1.1× larger
INGR
$1.8B
$1.6B
LW
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
LW
LW
+5.3% gap
LW
2.9%
-2.4%
INGR
Higher net margin
INGR
INGR
6.1% more per $
INGR
9.5%
3.5%
LW
More free cash flow
INGR
INGR
$306.3M more FCF
INGR
$270.0M
$-36.3M
LW
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
LW
LW
Annualised
LW
-1.5%
-3.4%
INGR

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
INGR
INGR
LW
LW
Revenue
$1.8B
$1.6B
Net Profit
$167.0M
$54.0M
Gross Margin
24.5%
21.2%
Operating Margin
12.5%
8.1%
Net Margin
9.5%
3.5%
Revenue YoY
-2.4%
2.9%
Net Profit YoY
72.2%
-63.0%
EPS (diluted)
$2.58
$0.39

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
INGR
INGR
LW
LW
Q1 26
$1.6B
Q4 25
$1.8B
$1.6B
Q3 25
$1.8B
$1.7B
Q2 25
$1.8B
$1.7B
Q1 25
$1.8B
$1.5B
Q4 24
$1.8B
$1.6B
Q3 24
$1.9B
$1.7B
Q2 24
$1.9B
$1.6B
Net Profit
INGR
INGR
LW
LW
Q1 26
$54.0M
Q4 25
$167.0M
$62.1M
Q3 25
$171.0M
$64.3M
Q2 25
$196.0M
$119.9M
Q1 25
$197.0M
$146.0M
Q4 24
$97.0M
$-36.1M
Q3 24
$188.0M
$127.4M
Q2 24
$148.0M
$129.6M
Gross Margin
INGR
INGR
LW
LW
Q1 26
21.2%
Q4 25
24.5%
20.0%
Q3 25
25.1%
20.6%
Q2 25
26.0%
20.4%
Q1 25
25.7%
27.8%
Q4 24
24.9%
17.4%
Q3 24
25.6%
21.5%
Q2 24
23.7%
24.1%
Operating Margin
INGR
INGR
LW
LW
Q1 26
8.1%
Q4 25
12.5%
8.6%
Q3 25
13.7%
9.4%
Q2 25
14.8%
11.1%
Q1 25
15.2%
16.4%
Q4 24
9.0%
1.2%
Q3 24
14.3%
12.8%
Q2 24
12.8%
13.2%
Net Margin
INGR
INGR
LW
LW
Q1 26
3.5%
Q4 25
9.5%
3.8%
Q3 25
9.4%
3.9%
Q2 25
10.7%
7.2%
Q1 25
10.9%
9.6%
Q4 24
5.4%
-2.3%
Q3 24
10.1%
7.7%
Q2 24
7.9%
8.0%
EPS (diluted)
INGR
INGR
LW
LW
Q1 26
$0.39
Q4 25
$2.58
$0.44
Q3 25
$2.61
$0.46
Q2 25
$2.99
$0.84
Q1 25
$3.00
$1.03
Q4 24
$1.43
$-0.25
Q3 24
$2.83
$0.88
Q2 24
$2.22
$0.89

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
INGR
INGR
LW
LW
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.0B
$57.5M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$3.6B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$4.3B
$1.8B
Total Assets
$7.9B
$7.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.99×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
INGR
INGR
LW
LW
Q1 26
$57.5M
Q4 25
$1.0B
$82.7M
Q3 25
$915.0M
$98.6M
Q2 25
$861.0M
$70.7M
Q1 25
$837.0M
$67.5M
Q4 24
$997.0M
$79.0M
Q3 24
$877.0M
$120.8M
Q2 24
$505.0M
$71.4M
Total Debt
INGR
INGR
LW
LW
Q1 26
$3.6B
Q4 25
$3.6B
Q3 25
$3.7B
Q2 25
$3.7B
Q1 25
$3.7B
Q4 24
$3.7B
Q3 24
$3.4B
Q2 24
$3.4B
Stockholders' Equity
INGR
INGR
LW
LW
Q1 26
$1.8B
Q4 25
$4.3B
$1.8B
Q3 25
$4.2B
$1.8B
Q2 25
$4.2B
$1.7B
Q1 25
$4.0B
$1.6B
Q4 24
$3.8B
$1.6B
Q3 24
$4.0B
$1.8B
Q2 24
$3.7B
$1.8B
Total Assets
INGR
INGR
LW
LW
Q1 26
$7.4B
Q4 25
$7.9B
$7.3B
Q3 25
$7.8B
$7.2B
Q2 25
$7.8B
$7.4B
Q1 25
$7.5B
$7.4B
Q4 24
$7.4B
$7.5B
Q3 24
$7.5B
$7.5B
Q2 24
$7.2B
$7.4B
Debt / Equity
INGR
INGR
LW
LW
Q1 26
1.99×
Q4 25
2.08×
Q3 25
2.05×
Q2 25
2.12×
Q1 25
2.25×
Q4 24
2.26×
Q3 24
1.87×
Q2 24
1.92×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
INGR
INGR
LW
LW
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$405.0M
$65.2M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$270.0M
$-36.3M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
15.4%
-2.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
7.7%
6.5%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.43×
1.21×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$511.0M
$569.2M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
INGR
INGR
LW
LW
Q1 26
$65.2M
Q4 25
$405.0M
$178.4M
Q3 25
$277.0M
$352.0M
Q2 25
$185.0M
$868.3M
Q1 25
$77.0M
$56.0M
Q4 24
$436.0M
$99.1M
Q3 24
$479.0M
$330.2M
Q2 24
$312.0M
$798.2M
Free Cash Flow
INGR
INGR
LW
LW
Q1 26
$-36.3M
Q4 25
$270.0M
$101.0M
Q3 25
$172.0M
$274.4M
Q2 25
$84.0M
$230.1M
Q1 25
$-15.0M
$-19.8M
Q4 24
$311.0M
$-49.6M
Q3 24
$429.0M
$4.3M
Q2 24
$257.0M
$-131.3M
FCF Margin
INGR
INGR
LW
LW
Q1 26
-2.3%
Q4 25
15.4%
6.2%
Q3 25
9.5%
16.5%
Q2 25
4.6%
13.7%
Q1 25
-0.8%
-1.3%
Q4 24
17.3%
-3.1%
Q3 24
22.9%
0.3%
Q2 24
13.7%
-8.1%
Capex Intensity
INGR
INGR
LW
LW
Q1 26
6.5%
Q4 25
7.7%
4.8%
Q3 25
5.8%
4.7%
Q2 25
5.5%
38.1%
Q1 25
5.1%
5.0%
Q4 24
6.9%
9.3%
Q3 24
2.7%
19.7%
Q2 24
2.9%
57.7%
Cash Conversion
INGR
INGR
LW
LW
Q1 26
1.21×
Q4 25
2.43×
2.87×
Q3 25
1.62×
5.47×
Q2 25
0.94×
7.24×
Q1 25
0.39×
0.38×
Q4 24
4.49×
Q3 24
2.55×
2.59×
Q2 24
2.11×
6.16×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

INGR
INGR

Food And Industrial Ingredients LATAM Segment$599.0M34%
Texture And Healthful Solutions Segment$598.0M34%
Food And Industrial Ingredients U.S.Canada Segment$486.0M28%
Other$74.0M4%

LW
LW

Segments North America$1.0B66%
Segments International$529.8M34%

Related Comparisons