vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INNO HOLDINGS INC. (INHD) and Laser Photonics Corp (LASE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INNO HOLDINGS INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5M vs $919.3K, roughly 1.6× Laser Photonics Corp). INNO HOLDINGS INC. runs the higher net margin — -2.0% vs -506.4%, a 504.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INNO HOLDINGS INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (635.6% vs 28.3%).
INNOvative Retail BV, is an upmarket Belgian department store chain that operates sixteen branches around Belgium.
IPG Photonics Corporation is a manufacturer of fiber lasers. IPG Photonics developed and commercialized optical fiber lasers, which are used in a variety of applications including materials processing, medical applications and telecommunications. IPG has manufacturing facilities in the United States, Germany, Russia and Italy.
INHD vs LASE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5M | $919.3K |
| Net Profit | $-28.6K | $-4.7M |
| Gross Margin | 5.1% | -20.1% |
| Operating Margin | -33.4% | -350.0% |
| Net Margin | -2.0% | -506.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 635.6% | 28.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 95.3% | -186.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $-0.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1M | $919.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $478.1K | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $196.0K | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $490.0K | $716.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $623.4K | ||
| Q1 24 | $183.2K | $743.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-28.6K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.3M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.6M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-603.7K | $586.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-287.2K | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-934.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | $-545.7K |
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | -20.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.5% | 53.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | 49.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 85.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 51.9% |
| Q4 25 | -33.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -89.7% | -350.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -143.7% | -37.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -286.4% | -68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -233.7% | -255.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 87.7% | -238.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -149.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -150.9% | -73.8% |
| Q4 25 | -2.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -120.5% | -506.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -142.4% | -68.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -757.3% | -73.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -308.0% | 45.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -58.6% | -226.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -149.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -578.9% | -73.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.03 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.30 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.83 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.21 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.51 | $-0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $37.1M | $3.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $47.2M | $4.1M |
| Total Assets | $47.3M | $17.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $37.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | $78.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9M | $179.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8M | $533.9K | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $47.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.2M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.0M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.1M | $12.4M |
| Q4 25 | $47.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.0M | $17.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8M | $14.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | $16.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.7M | $17.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $13.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-5.0M | $763.1K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-5.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.0M | $763.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-594.8K | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.0M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.1M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-660.2K | $632.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.9M | $-866.3K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-795.1K | $589.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.2M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1083.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -162.3% | 82.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -388.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1720.9% | -136.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.5% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 118.1% | 20.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -11.11× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
