vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INFINITY NATURAL RESOURCES, INC. (INR) and SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO (SHEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INFINITY NATURAL RESOURCES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($115.5M vs $91.6M, roughly 1.3× SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO). INFINITY NATURAL RESOURCES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 17.3% vs -5.9%, a 23.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Shenandoah Telecommunications Co is a U.S. regional telecom provider offering broadband internet, wireless voice/data services, digital cable TV, and fiber-optic solutions. It serves residential, small business and enterprise clients across Mid-Atlantic states, focusing on underserved rural and suburban markets in Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland and Pennsylvania.
INR vs SHEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $115.5M | $91.6M |
| Net Profit | $20.0M | $-5.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 47.0% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | 17.3% | -5.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 7.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -95.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.33 | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $115.5M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.3M | $89.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.5M | $88.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.2M | $87.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $85.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $87.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $85.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $69.2M |
| Q4 25 | $20.0M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.4M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.0M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-34.6M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-12.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $214.7M |
| Q4 25 | 47.0% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.5% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.9% | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -104.5% | -6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -18.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -4.0% |
| Q4 25 | 17.3% | -5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.3% | -10.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.8% | -10.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -41.1% | -10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -15.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 310.0% |
| Q4 25 | $1.33 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.65 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.18 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.27 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.8M | $27.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $55.0K | $642.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $307.1M | $880.8M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | 0.73× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.8M | $27.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6M | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $87.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $46.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $43.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $43.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $389.7M |
| Q4 25 | $55.0K | $642.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $535.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $513.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $123.0K | $515.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $418.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $345.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $297.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $298.7M |
| Q4 25 | $307.1M | $880.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $288.6M | $892.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.1M | $902.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-52.2M | $910.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $918.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $925.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $933.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $871.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $953.9M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.34× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $75.1M | $28.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-78.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -85.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 117.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.75× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-257.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $75.1M | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.1M | $30.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.4M | $20.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.2M | $20.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $20.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $15.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-78.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-65.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-62.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-72.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-51.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-78.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-54.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | -85.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -57.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -73.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -71.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -84.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -58.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -91.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -79.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 117.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 91.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 97.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 94.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 108.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 86.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 94.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 101.2% |
| Q4 25 | 3.75× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.91× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.07× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
INR
| Oil Reserves | $54.0M | 47% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $46.8M | 41% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $14.7M | 13% |
SHEN
| Residential And SMB Incumbent Broadband | $41.5M | 45% |
| Residential And SMB Glo Fiber Expansion Markets | $23.0M | 25% |
| Commercial Fiber | $20.3M | 22% |
| RLEC Other | $6.8M | 7% |
