vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INFINITY NATURAL RESOURCES, INC. (INR) and Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INFINITY NATURAL RESOURCES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($115.5M vs $100.0M, roughly 1.2× Latham Group, Inc.). INFINITY NATURAL RESOURCES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 17.3% vs -7.0%, a 24.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Latham & Watkins LLP is an American multinational law firm. Founded in 1934 in Los Angeles, California, it is known for its litigation, corporate, and regulatory law practices.
INR vs SWIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $115.5M | $100.0M |
| Net Profit | $20.0M | $-7.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 47.0% | -10.7% |
| Net Margin | 17.3% | -7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 14.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 76.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.33 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $115.5M | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.3M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.5M | $172.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.2M | $111.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $87.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $150.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $160.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $110.6M |
| Q4 25 | $20.0M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.4M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.0M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-34.6M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-29.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-7.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 27.7% |
| Q4 25 | 47.0% | -10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.5% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.9% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -104.5% | -4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 17.3% | -7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.3% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.8% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -41.1% | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -33.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -7.1% |
| Q4 25 | $1.33 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.65 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.18 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.27 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $55.0K | $279.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $307.1M | $405.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $823.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $55.0K | $279.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $281.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $281.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $123.0K | $306.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $281.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $282.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $282.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $282.8M |
| Q4 25 | $307.1M | $405.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $288.6M | $408.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.1M | $398.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-52.2M | $381.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $387.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $416.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $408.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $391.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $823.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $844.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $822.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $953.9M | $824.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $794.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $853.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $830.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $808.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.72× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $75.1M | $23.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $14.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 14.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 9.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.75× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $38.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $75.1M | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.1M | $51.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.4M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.2M | $-46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $37.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $52.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-34.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $14.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $45.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-50.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-98.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $33.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $47.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-39.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -45.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -36.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | 3.75× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.04× | 6.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.91× | 2.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.95× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
INR
| Oil Reserves | $54.0M | 47% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $46.8M | 41% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $14.7M | 13% |
SWIM
| In Ground Swimming Pools | $50.2M | 50% |
| Covers | $37.0M | 37% |
| Liners | $12.7M | 13% |
