vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INTRUSION INC (INTZ) and Kentucky First Federal Bancorp (KFFB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kentucky First Federal Bancorp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8M vs $1.5M, roughly 1.9× INTRUSION INC). Kentucky First Federal Bancorp runs the higher net margin — 10.7% vs -190.7%, a 201.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kentucky First Federal Bancorp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.3% vs -11.6%). Kentucky First Federal Bancorp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-367.0K vs $-549.0K). Over the past eight quarters, Kentucky First Federal Bancorp's revenue compounded faster (24.0% CAGR vs 14.4%).
INTRUSION INCINTZEarnings & Financial Report
Intrusion Inc. is a cybersecurity company based in Plano, Texas. It provides cybersecurity solutions, including network intrusion detection and prevention systems.
Kentucky First Federal Bancorp is a U.S. regional bank holding company based in Kentucky. It offers retail and commercial banking services including deposits, mortgage loans, consumer lending and small business financing, serving local individual customers and small-to-medium enterprises across its Kentucky operating regions.
INTZ vs KFFB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5M | $2.8M |
| Net Profit | $-2.8M | $304.0K |
| Gross Margin | 74.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -192.4% | 14.1% |
| Net Margin | -190.7% | 10.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -11.6% | 28.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -44.4% | 2238.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.15 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5M | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8M | $2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7M | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5M | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1M | $1.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | $304.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.1M | $344.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.0M | $176.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | $7.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.0M | $13.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $-15.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.1M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.7M | $-107.0K |
| Q4 25 | 74.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 76.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 75.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 74.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 77.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 76.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 80.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -192.4% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -108.6% | 17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -111.4% | 10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -117.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -113.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -135.5% | -1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -139.2% | -58.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -218.6% | -7.9% |
| Q4 25 | -190.7% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -106.5% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -109.0% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -118.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -116.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -136.3% | -0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -141.6% | -56.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -151.7% | -5.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.15 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.10 | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.11 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.19 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.35 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.53 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.94 | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.6M | $19.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.3M | $49.1M |
| Total Assets | $10.4M | $375.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.6M | $19.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5M | $14.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.4M | $19.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.7M | $27.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9M | $21.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | $18.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $122.0K | $15.4M |
| Q4 25 | $7.3M | $49.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8M | $48.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.6M | $48.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.4M | $48.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.3M | $48.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $48.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $48.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2M | $49.0M |
| Q4 25 | $10.4M | $375.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.7M | $366.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.4M | $371.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0M | $380.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.5M | $374.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4M | $375.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5M | $375.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.7M | $369.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-531.0K | $-303.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-549.0K | $-367.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -37.1% | -12.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -1.00× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-7.5M | $-377.0K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-531.0K | $-303.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.0M | $450.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.6M | $-86.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | $-155.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-178.0K | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.9M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | $-176.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-549.0K | $-367.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.0M | $445.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.9M | $-235.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | $-220.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-645.0K | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.0M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2M | $-191.0K |
| Q4 25 | -37.1% | -12.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -153.2% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -101.1% | -9.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -117.3% | -9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -38.5% | 61.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -140.4% | -70.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -202.3% | -77.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -104.2% | -10.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.8% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.1% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.9% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.7% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.49× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -22.14× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 111.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
