vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Inuvo, Inc. (INUV) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Inuvo, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.3M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.1× Laird Superfood, Inc.). Inuvo, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -4.2% vs -13.2%, a 9.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs -45.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs -8.5%).
Inuvo, Inc. is a digital marketing technology firm that develops AI-powered advertising solutions. It offers intent-based audience targeting, performance marketing, and brand awareness services for retail, finance, and consumer goods clients, mainly operating across the North American market.
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
INUV vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.3M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $-593.9K | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | 66.4% | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | -8.5% | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | -4.2% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -45.6% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -520.2% | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $14.3M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.6M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.7M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.7M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.2M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.4M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.2M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.0M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-593.9K | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $141.3K | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.7M | $-239.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.1M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | 66.4% | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 73.4% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 75.4% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 79.0% | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 83.1% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 88.4% | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 84.0% | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 87.7% | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | -8.5% | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.4% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.0% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.6% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.7% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.3% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -12.3% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | -4.2% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.7% | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.6% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -9.1% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.6% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -12.4% | -10.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.12 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.02 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.0M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $24.9M | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0M | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $10.0M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.4M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.1M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.4M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.5M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.4M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.5M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.1M | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $24.9M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.9M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.7M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.7M | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.2M | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.0M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.5M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.8M | $17.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $21.0K | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-339.9K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-3.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $21.0K | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.7K | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-366.9K | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $329.9K | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.4K | $642.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.4M | $-422.3K |
| Q4 25 | $-339.9K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-263.1K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-818.6K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-117.7K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $584.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-266.3K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | -2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.33× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
INUV
Segment breakdown not available.
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
