vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) and TRICO BANCSHARES (TCBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TRICO BANCSHARES is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($109.4M vs $61.9M, roughly 1.8× IonQ, Inc.). IonQ, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1217.8% vs 251.6%, a 966.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, IonQ, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (428.5% vs 9.0%). TRICO BANCSHARES produced more free cash flow last quarter ($127.9M vs $-83.3M).
IonQ, Inc. is an American quantum computing hardware and software company headquartered in College Park, Maryland. The company develops general-purpose trapped ion quantum computers and accompanying software to generate, optimize, and execute quantum circuits.
Trico Bancshares is a U.S.-headquartered regional bank holding company operating Tri Counties Bank. It offers a full range of retail and commercial banking services including deposit products, mortgages, small business loans, and wealth management, primarily serving consumers and SMEs in Northern California.
IONQ vs TCBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $61.9M | $109.4M |
| Net Profit | $753.7M | $33.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -369.4% | 42.6% |
| Net Margin | 1217.8% | 251.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 428.5% | 9.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 473.1% | 15.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.60 | $1.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $61.9M | $109.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.9M | $107.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.7M | $103.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $98.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.7M | $100.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.4M | $99.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.4M | $97.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $98.5M |
| Q4 25 | $753.7M | $33.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.1B | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-176.8M | $27.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $26.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-202.0M | $29.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-52.5M | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.6M | $29.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $27.7M |
| Q4 25 | -369.4% | 42.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -423.5% | 43.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -776.0% | 36.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -661.9% | 38.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -428.5% | 39.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -430.0% | 40.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 38.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1217.8% | 251.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2646.3% | 31.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -854.5% | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1725.0% | 221.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -423.4% | 29.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -330.0% | 29.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.2% |
| Q4 25 | $2.60 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.58 | $1.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.70 | $0.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.80 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.95 | $0.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.24 | $0.88 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.18 | $0.87 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.83 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.4B | $157.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.8B | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $6.6B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $157.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $298.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $546.9M | $314.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $308.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.3M | $145.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $365.7M | $320.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $369.8M | $206.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $82.8M |
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $383.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $435.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $463.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $6.6B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.3B | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $508.4M | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $497.9M | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $517.4M | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-74.5M | $133.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-83.3M | $127.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -134.6% | 116.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 14.2% | 4.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.10× | 3.96× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-307.3M | $222.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-74.5M | $133.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-123.1M | $45.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-52.6M | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $24.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-39.4M | $109.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.2M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-26.6M | $31.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $25.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-83.3M | $127.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-127.2M | $43.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-53.8M | $28.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $22.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-43.0M | $105.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.0M | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-34.1M | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $24.1M |
| Q4 25 | -134.6% | 116.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -319.1% | 40.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -259.8% | 27.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -367.4% | 104.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -185.3% | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -299.3% | 31.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 24.4% |
| Q4 25 | 14.2% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.7% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 65.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | -0.10× | 3.96× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.90× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IONQ
| Other | $31.2M | 50% |
| Platform Consulting And Support Services | $30.7M | 50% |
TCBK
Segment breakdown not available.
