vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Iridium Communications Inc. (IRDM) and Life360, Inc. (LIF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Iridium Communications Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($219.1M vs $146.0M, roughly 1.5× Life360, Inc.). Life360, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 88.8% vs 9.9%, a 79.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Life360, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.4% vs 1.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Life360, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (36.6% CAGR vs 4.4%).
Iridium Communications Inc. is a publicly traded American company headquartered in McLean, Virginia, United States. Iridium operates the Iridium satellite constellation, a system of 80 satellites: 66 are active satellites and the remaining fourteen function as in-orbit spares. Iridium Satellites are used for worldwide voice and data communication from handheld satellite phones, satellite messenger communication devices and integrated transceivers, as well as for two-way satellite messaging se...
Life360, Inc. develops family-focused safety and connectivity platforms. Core offerings include real-time location sharing, emergency alerts, driving behavior analysis tools and identity theft protection. It serves consumer markets across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific, with most revenue from tiered premium subscription plans.
IRDM vs LIF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $219.1M | $146.0M |
| Net Profit | $21.6M | $129.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 75.1% |
| Operating Margin | 23.2% | 6.1% |
| Net Margin | 9.9% | 88.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.9% | 26.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 1425.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.53 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $219.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $212.9M | $146.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $226.9M | $124.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $216.9M | $115.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.9M | $103.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $213.0M | $115.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $212.8M | $92.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $201.1M | $84.9M |
| Q1 26 | $21.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $24.9M | $129.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.1M | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.0M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.4M | $4.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.3M | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.4M | $7.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.3M | $-11.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 75.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 78.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 78.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 80.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 74.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 75.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 75.0% |
| Q1 26 | 23.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.9% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.9% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.5% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.8% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.7% | -2.8% |
| Q1 26 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | 88.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.4% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.1% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.1% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.5% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | -12.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.24 | $1.53 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.35 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.27 | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.30 | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.21 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.27 | $-0.15 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $494.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $548.2M |
| Total Assets | — | $959.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $96.5M | $494.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.5M | $455.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.3M | $432.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.9M | $168.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.5M | $159.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $159.6M | $159.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.5M | $160.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $462.6M | $548.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $450.5M | $391.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $473.6M | $366.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $518.4M | $376.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $576.6M | $358.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $663.8M | $339.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $786.7M | $326.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $959.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $787.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $753.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $455.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $441.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $427.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $405.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.80× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $36.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $36.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 25.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.7% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.28× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $86.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $108.6M | $36.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.8M | $26.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $129.6M | $13.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.1M | $12.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $104.8M | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $118.6M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $81.1M | $3.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $75.1M | $36.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.2M | $25.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $12.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.5M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.5M | $11.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $100.0M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $68.7M | $3.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.3% | 25.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.9% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.2% | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.8% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.0% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.2% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.4% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.37× | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.71× | 2.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.90× | 1.90× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.01× | 2.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.88× | 1.45× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.85× | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.51× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IRDM
| Voice and data | $57.4M | 26% |
| IoT data (2) | $46.0M | 21% |
| Government | $39.5M | 18% |
| Government service revenue (5) | $27.6M | 13% |
| Subscriber equipment | $20.2M | 9% |
| Hosted payload and other data service (4) | $14.8M | 7% |
| Broadband (3) | $12.2M | 6% |
| Commercial | $1.3M | 1% |
LIF
Segment breakdown not available.
