vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INDEPENDENCE REALTY TRUST, INC. (IRT) and Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd (LANV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INDEPENDENCE REALTY TRUST, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($165.3M vs $144.1M, roughly 1.1× Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd).
Brandywine Realty Trust is a Philadelphia-based real estate investment trust (REIT) that invests in office buildings in Philadelphia, Washington, D.C., and Austin, Texas.
Lanvin is a French luxury fashion house founded in 1889 by Jeanne Lanvin in Paris. It is the oldest French fashion house still in operation. Since 2018, it has been a subsidiary of Shanghai-based Lanvin Group. Lanvin Group includes Lanvin, Sergio Rossi, Wolford, St. John Knits, and Caruso.
IRT vs LANV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $165.3M | $144.1M |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 53.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -60.5% |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | 2.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $165.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $167.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $167.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $162.2M | $144.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $161.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $160.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $158.4M | $184.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $33.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 53.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 57.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -60.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -35.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.05 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $23.3M | $32.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $290.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.4B | $-116.4M |
| Total Assets | $6.1B | $632.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $23.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.5M | $32.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.0M | $19.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $290.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $136.4M |
| Q1 26 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $-116.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $100.1M |
| Q1 26 | $6.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0B | $632.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.9B | $731.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.66× | 1.36× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-75.1K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $282.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $82.2M | $-75.1K | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $259.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.0M | $-36.2K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.48× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.51× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.22× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.23× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.02× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IRT
| Rental and other property revenue | $165.2M | 100% |
| Other revenue | $109.0K | 0% |
LANV
Segment breakdown not available.
