vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IRONWOOD PHARMACEUTICALS INC (IRWD) and Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IRONWOOD PHARMACEUTICALS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($47.7M vs $37.8M, roughly 1.3× Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc.). Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 0.1% vs -4.8%, a 4.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.8% vs -47.3%).
Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a publicly traded pharmaceutical company. It was originally called Microbia, Inc.
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. is a specialty insurance holding company that offers a broad portfolio of property and casualty insurance products, with a core focus on residential and commercial flood insurance for customers across the United States. It serves both individual consumers and small to mid-sized business clients, using advanced data analytics to support accurate policy pricing and robust risk management.
IRWD vs NP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $47.7M | $37.8M |
| Net Profit | $-2.3M | $50.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 14.3% | — |
| Net Margin | -4.8% | 0.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -47.3% | 28.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -200.9% | 0.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.01 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $37.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $47.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.1M | $44.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.6M | $33.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $94.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $50.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.1M | $11.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-37.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6M | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-860.0K | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 61.8% | 46.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -70.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.0% | 58.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -4.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.8% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -90.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 35.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.23 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.23 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $215.5M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-261.8M | — |
| Total Assets | $396.9M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $215.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $140.4M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $108.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $88.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $105.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $199.5M | $247.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $199.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $199.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $198.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $198.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-261.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-264.2M | $-509.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-308.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-334.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-301.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-311.3M | $-374.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-321.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $396.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $396.1M | $89.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $342.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $327.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $350.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $389.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $395.6M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $74.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $74.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 156.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $127.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $74.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.6M | $38.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $74.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 156.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.19× | 3.38× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.64× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.74× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.71× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
