vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS & SUPPORT INC (ISSC) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS & SUPPORT INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($21.8M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.6× Laird Superfood, Inc.). INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS & SUPPORT INC runs the higher net margin — 18.6% vs -13.2%, a 31.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS & SUPPORT INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (36.6% vs 15.0%). Over the past eight quarters, INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS & SUPPORT INC's revenue compounded faster (42.5% CAGR vs 16.1%).
Motorola Solutions, Inc., is an American technology company that provides safety and security products and services. Headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, the company provides critical communications, video security, and command center technologies, used by public safety agencies and enterprises. It was formed in 2011 by the division of Motorola, Inc., and is its legal successor; the former company's mobile phone division was spun off as Motorola Mobility, now part of Chinese technology company...
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
ISSC vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.8M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $4.1M | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | 54.5% | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | 28.9% | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | 18.6% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 36.6% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 451.4% | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.22 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $21.8M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.1M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.9M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.4M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.7M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $4.1M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1M | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4M | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $736.2K | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2M | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $-239.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | 54.5% | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.2% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.5% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 51.4% | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.4% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.4% | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.4% | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 52.0% | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | 28.9% | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.0% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.8% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.4% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.3% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.3% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.0% | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.1% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.3% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.7% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.3% | -10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.22 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.3M | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $23.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $68.7M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $109.9M | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.35× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.3M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $601.8K | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $604.6K | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $539.0K | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $521.0K | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $574.1K | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $23.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $68.7M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.6M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.8M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.5M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.8M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.6M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.2M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $41.4M | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $109.9M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.4M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.8M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $89.9M | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.3M | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.4M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.8M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $57.6M | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.38× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.2M | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $7.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 32.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.01× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $12.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8M | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.3K | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $934.1K | $642.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $201.1K | $-422.3K |
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-267.7K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $299.5K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $730.8K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $75.4K | — |
| Q4 25 | 32.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.01× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.95× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.50× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.17× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ISSC
| Products | $13.6M | 62% |
| Services | $8.2M | 38% |
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
