vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. (ITP) and Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (SAMG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($32.0M vs $25.6M, roughly 1.2× IT TECH PACKAGING, INC.). Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — -0.4% vs -5.7%, a 5.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.1% vs -0.0%). Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($15.0M vs $1.5M). Over the past eight quarters, IT TECH PACKAGING, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs 2.7%).
IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. is a paper manufacturing enterprise primarily operating in China. It produces and distributes a diverse portfolio of paper products including corrugated packaging paper, boxboard, and printing-use cultural paper, serving sectors such as consumer goods packaging, logistics, and commercial printing across its core market.
ITP vs SAMG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.6M | $32.0M |
| Net Profit | $-1.4M | $-120.0K |
| Gross Margin | 7.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -3.9% | -2.8% |
| Net Margin | -5.7% | -0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.1% | -0.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 26.6% | -107.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $32.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.6M | $31.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.8M | $30.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.9M | $31.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.6M | $32.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.1M | $30.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.2M | $31.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9M | $30.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-120.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4M | $618.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.0M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.5M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.0M | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-77.7K | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.7M | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.9% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.1% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -31.0% | 15.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -21.5% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.8% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 17.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -51.0% | 19.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.9% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -32.2% | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.9% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.9% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.3% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -54.6% | 9.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.35 | $0.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.40 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.20 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $0.28 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.37 | $0.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $44.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $152.0M | $50.3M |
| Total Assets | $175.7M | $166.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.03× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $44.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $36.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $30.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $36.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $68.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $58.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $49.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $39.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $50.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $152.0M | $58.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.3M | $64.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $152.8M | $80.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $156.1M | $80.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.3M | $84.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $163.5M | $85.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $164.3M | $83.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $166.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $175.7M | $157.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $175.2M | $152.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $175.2M | $159.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $177.5M | $194.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $190.0M | $184.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $191.4M | $177.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $177.5M | $170.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.07× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.5M | $18.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.5M | $15.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.9% | 46.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 11.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $3.8M | $17.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $18.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $14.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | $-24.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5M | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5M | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $721.9K | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $624.4K | $-24.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $15.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5M | $19.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $668.3K | $15.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $615.4K | $-24.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 46.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 44.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.4% | 43.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -22.8% | -80.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.6% | 62.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | 42.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 50.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.0% | -81.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.62× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -10.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -8.03× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ITP
Segment breakdown not available.
SAMG
| Investment Advisory Management And Administrative Service | $30.7M | 96% |
| Tax And Family Office Services | $1.2M | 4% |
