vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INVO Fertility, Inc. (IVF) and Kentucky First Federal Bancorp (KFFB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kentucky First Federal Bancorp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8M vs $1.8M, roughly 1.6× INVO Fertility, Inc.). Kentucky First Federal Bancorp runs the higher net margin — 10.7% vs -150.5%, a 161.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kentucky First Federal Bancorp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.3% vs 22.6%). Kentucky First Federal Bancorp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-367.0K vs $-1.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Kentucky First Federal Bancorp's revenue compounded faster (24.0% CAGR vs 12.8%).
INVO Fertility, Inc. is a specialized healthcare company focused on delivering accessible assisted reproductive technology solutions. It develops, manufactures and markets the patented INVOcell intravaginal culture system for in vitro fertilization procedures, serving fertility clinics and patients across North America, Europe and other global regions, with a mission to reduce barriers to high-quality fertility care.
Kentucky First Federal Bancorp is a U.S. regional bank holding company based in Kentucky. It offers retail and commercial banking services including deposits, mortgage loans, consumer lending and small business financing, serving local individual customers and small-to-medium enterprises across its Kentucky operating regions.
IVF vs KFFB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8M | $2.8M |
| Net Profit | $-2.6M | $304.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -93.1% | 14.1% |
| Net Margin | -150.5% | 10.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 22.6% | 28.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -62.2% | 2238.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.77 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7M | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4M | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6M | $1.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $304.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | $344.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.3M | $176.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.4M | $7.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.6M | $13.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.6M | $-15.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.2M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6M | $-107.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -93.1% | 17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -160.4% | 10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1042.1% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -202.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -90.7% | -1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -100.9% | -58.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -95.7% | -7.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -150.5% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -283.6% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1060.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -211.3% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -113.8% | -0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -122.2% | -56.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -101.3% | -5.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.77 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.30 | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.53 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.86 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.11 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-22.39 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.55 | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $19.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.8M | $49.1M |
| Total Assets | $18.8M | $375.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.34× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $19.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $14.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $19.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $27.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $18.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $15.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $49.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8M | $48.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6M | $48.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3M | $48.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.7M | $48.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.3K | $48.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | $48.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.2K | $49.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $375.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.8M | $366.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.3M | $371.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.7M | $380.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.4M | $374.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.0M | $375.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.8M | $375.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.3M | $369.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.83× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.8M | $-303.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.8M | $-367.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -101.6% | -12.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -1.00× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-7.8M | $-377.0K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-303.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.8M | $450.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.7M | $-86.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.5M | $-155.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-617.4K | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-640.8K | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.5M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-260.6K | $-176.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-367.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.8M | $445.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.7M | $-235.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.6M | $-220.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-696.3K | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.5M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-310.3K | $-191.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | -12.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -101.6% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -92.6% | -9.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -216.9% | -9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -40.6% | 61.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -70.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -82.3% | -77.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -19.7% | -10.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.49× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -22.14× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 111.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
