vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (IVR) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($21.3M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.6× Laird Superfood, Inc.). Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. runs the higher net margin — 242.2% vs -13.2%, a 255.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (55.4% vs 15.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (74.2% CAGR vs 16.1%).
Invesco Ltd. is an American independent investment management company headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, with branch offices in 20 countries. Its common stock is a constituent of the S&P 500 and trades on the New York Stock Exchange. Invesco operates under the Invesco, Invesco Perpetual, and Powershares brand names.
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
IVR vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.3M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $51.5M | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | 242.2% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 55.4% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1368.7% | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.72 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $21.3M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.6M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.7M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.8M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.7M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.6M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $51.5M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $53.5M | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-23.3M | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.6M | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5M | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.7M | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-13.5M | $-239.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.1M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | 242.2% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 303.6% | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -131.6% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 104.4% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.6% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 542.2% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -155.9% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 415.9% | -10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.72 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.74 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.40 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.26 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.63 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.38 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.49 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $56.0M | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $797.5M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $6.5B | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $56.0M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.5M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.4M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.9M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $73.4M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.3M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.8M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.9M | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $797.5M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $769.6M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $709.4M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $759.2M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $730.7M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $857.0M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $759.2M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $785.6M | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.0B | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.2B | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.7B | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1B | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.1B | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2B | $17.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $157.1M | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.05× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $157.1M | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.3M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.6M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.3M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $183.2M | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.8M | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.0M | $642.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $57.5M | $-422.3K |
| Q4 25 | 3.05× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.24× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.76× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.97× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IVR
Segment breakdown not available.
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
