vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of InvenTrust Properties Corp. (IVT) and Phreesia, Inc. (PHR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Phreesia, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($120.3M vs $77.4M, roughly 1.6× InvenTrust Properties Corp.). Phreesia, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.5% vs 3.4%, a 0.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Phreesia, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.7% vs 8.6%). InvenTrust Properties Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($110.9M vs $12.2M).
InvenTrust Properties Corp. is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping malls. As of December 31, 2024, the company owned interests in 68 properties comprising 11.0 million square feet.
Phreesia, Inc. is a software as a service company that offers healthcare organizations a set of applications to automate and manage patient intake.
IVT vs PHR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $77.4M | $120.3M |
| Net Profit | $2.7M | $4.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -11.0% | 3.1% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | 3.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.6% | 12.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -72.8% | 129.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $77.4M | $120.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.5M | $117.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.6M | $115.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $67.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $66.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.0M | $654.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $95.9M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-539.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | -11.0% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.8% | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -18.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 130.4% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.08 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.23 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.04 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $106.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $825.9M | $3.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.8B | $320.3M |
| Total Assets | $2.8B | $423.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.46× | 0.01× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $106.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $98.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $90.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $825.9M | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $764.6M | $4.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $746.3M | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $740.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $740.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $740.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $812.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $827.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $320.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $298.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $282.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $423.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $408.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $400.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.46× | 0.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.42× | 0.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.41× | 0.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.53× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $155.4M | $15.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $110.9M | $12.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 143.3% | 10.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 57.5% | 2.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 58.41× | 3.62× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $193.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $155.4M | $15.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.8M | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.7M | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $110.9M | $12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.4M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.0M | $11.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 143.3% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.2% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.6% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 141.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 57.5% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 50.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 58.41× | 3.62× | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.27× | 22.68× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.97× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.97× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.15× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.10× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IVT
Segment breakdown not available.
PHR
| Subscription And Services | $55.5M | 46% |
| Network Solutions | $37.4M | 31% |
| Payment Processing Fees | $27.4M | 23% |
