vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IZEA Worldwide, Inc. (IZEA) and Rithm Property Trust Inc. (RPT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IZEA Worldwide, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.1M vs $3.4M, roughly 1.8× Rithm Property Trust Inc.). Rithm Property Trust Inc. runs the higher net margin — 95.4% vs -19.3%, a 114.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Rithm Property Trust Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-39.7% vs -44.9%). Over the past eight quarters, IZEA Worldwide, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-6.6% CAGR vs -43.2%).
IZEA Worldwide, Inc. is a global marketing technology firm that operates platforms linking brands, advertising agencies, and content creators including social media influencers, bloggers, and video creators. It offers end-to-end solutions for influencer marketing campaigns, content creation, performance tracking, and audience engagement, serving clients across consumer goods, retail, technology, and entertainment sectors primarily in North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific markets.
Rithm Capital Corp. (Rithm) is an American investment management company headquartered in New York that focuses on real estate and alternative investments.
IZEA vs RPT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.1M | $3.4M |
| Net Profit | $-1.2M | $3.2M |
| Gross Margin | 45.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -26.6% | 99.6% |
| Net Margin | -19.3% | 95.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -44.9% | -39.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 74.7% | 11.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $-0.26 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $6.1M | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.1M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.1M | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | $249.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $147.7K | $-273.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-142.8K | $-3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 52.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -26.6% | 99.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.1% | -6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.1% | 45.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | -1416.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -105.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -31.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -58.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -19.3% | 95.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.2% | 45.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.8% | -1363.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -42.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -99.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -47.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.07 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.52 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.20 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $50.9M | $79.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $9.1K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $48.9M | $291.6M |
| Total Assets | $57.5M | $1.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $50.9M | $79.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.4M | $81.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.6M | $98.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.2M | $97.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $55.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.1K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.9K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.7K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.6K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $63.4K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.3K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.1K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $108.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $48.9M | $291.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.9M | $291.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.4M | $294.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.3M | $296.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $48.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $62.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $57.5M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.9M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.6M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $59.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $62.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $76.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.00× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-5.2K | $-8.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -2.56× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-5.2K | $-8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-762.1K | $-25.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-787.8K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -25.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -43.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -48.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -2.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.05× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.63× | -0.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.