vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Jacobs Solutions (J) and Universal Health Services (UHS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Universal Health Services is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.5B vs $3.3B, roughly 1.4× Jacobs Solutions). Universal Health Services runs the higher net margin — 8.0% vs 3.8%, a 4.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Jacobs Solutions posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.3% vs 8.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Universal Health Services's revenue compounded faster (7.3% CAGR vs -12.2%).

Jacobs Solutions Inc. is an American international technical professional services firm based in Dallas. The company provides engineering, technical, professional, and construction services as well as scientific and specialty consulting for a broad range of clients globally, including companies, organizations, and government agencies. Jacobs has consistently ranked No.

Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) is an American Fortune 500 company that provides hospital and healthcare services, based in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. In 2024, UHS reported total revenues of $15.8 billion.

J vs UHS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
UHS
UHS
1.4× larger
UHS
$4.5B
$3.3B
J
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
J
J
+4.1% gap
J
12.3%
8.2%
UHS
Higher net margin
UHS
UHS
4.2% more per $
UHS
8.0%
3.8%
J
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
UHS
UHS
Annualised
UHS
7.3%
-12.2%
J

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
J
J
UHS
UHS
Revenue
$3.3B
$4.5B
Net Profit
$125.5M
$358.7M
Gross Margin
23.2%
Operating Margin
7.1%
11.2%
Net Margin
3.8%
8.0%
Revenue YoY
12.3%
8.2%
Net Profit YoY
792.3%
11.5%
EPS (diluted)
$1.12
$5.65

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
J
J
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
$4.5B
Q4 25
$3.3B
$4.5B
Q3 25
$3.2B
$4.5B
Q2 25
$3.0B
$4.3B
Q1 25
$2.9B
$4.1B
Q4 24
$2.9B
$4.1B
Q3 24
$-1.2B
$4.0B
Q2 24
$4.2B
$3.9B
Net Profit
J
J
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
$358.7M
Q4 25
$125.5M
$445.9M
Q3 25
$122.2M
$373.0M
Q2 25
$179.6M
$353.2M
Q1 25
$5.6M
$316.7M
Q4 24
$-18.1M
$332.4M
Q3 24
$325.4M
$258.7M
Q2 24
$146.9M
$289.2M
Gross Margin
J
J
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
Q4 25
23.2%
Q3 25
24.3%
Q2 25
25.0%
Q1 25
25.4%
Q4 24
24.6%
Q3 24
Q2 24
21.7%
Operating Margin
J
J
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
11.2%
Q4 25
7.1%
11.5%
Q3 25
6.7%
11.6%
Q2 25
7.8%
11.7%
Q1 25
7.2%
11.1%
Q4 24
7.1%
11.5%
Q3 24
9.7%
Q2 24
6.2%
11.2%
Net Margin
J
J
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
8.0%
Q4 25
3.8%
9.9%
Q3 25
3.9%
8.3%
Q2 25
5.9%
8.2%
Q1 25
0.2%
7.7%
Q4 24
-0.6%
8.1%
Q3 24
-28.1%
6.5%
Q2 24
3.5%
7.4%
EPS (diluted)
J
J
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
$5.65
Q4 25
$1.12
$7.01
Q3 25
$0.88
$5.86
Q2 25
$1.55
$5.43
Q1 25
$0.06
$4.80
Q4 24
$-0.11
$4.94
Q3 24
$2.50
$3.80
Q2 24
$1.17
$4.26

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
J
J
UHS
UHS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.6B
$119.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$4.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$3.4B
$7.5B
Total Assets
$11.6B
$15.7B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.63×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
J
J
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
$119.0M
Q4 25
$1.6B
$137.8M
Q3 25
$1.2B
$112.9M
Q2 25
$1.3B
$137.6M
Q1 25
$1.2B
$126.8M
Q4 24
$1.3B
$126.0M
Q3 24
$1.1B
$106.1M
Q2 24
$1.2B
$128.8M
Total Debt
J
J
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
$4.7B
Q4 25
$4.8B
Q3 25
$4.7B
Q2 25
$4.6B
Q1 25
$4.6B
Q4 24
$4.5B
Q3 24
$4.7B
Q2 24
$4.5B
Stockholders' Equity
J
J
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
$7.5B
Q4 25
$3.4B
$7.3B
Q3 25
$3.6B
$7.2B
Q2 25
$3.8B
$7.0B
Q1 25
$3.9B
$6.8B
Q4 24
$4.2B
$6.7B
Q3 24
$4.5B
$6.6B
Q2 24
$6.6B
$6.5B
Total Assets
J
J
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
$15.7B
Q4 25
$11.6B
$15.5B
Q3 25
$11.3B
$15.3B
Q2 25
$11.4B
$15.0B
Q1 25
$11.2B
$14.9B
Q4 24
$11.6B
$14.5B
Q3 24
$11.8B
$14.4B
Q2 24
$15.0B
$14.1B
Debt / Equity
J
J
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
0.63×
Q4 25
0.65×
Q3 25
0.66×
Q2 25
0.65×
Q1 25
0.68×
Q4 24
0.68×
Q3 24
0.71×
Q2 24
0.69×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
J
J
UHS
UHS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$380.8M
$401.6M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$364.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
11.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.5%
4.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
3.03×
1.12×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$875.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
J
J
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
$401.6M
Q4 25
$380.8M
$574.7M
Q3 25
$383.1M
$380.7M
Q2 25
$292.6M
$549.0M
Q1 25
$-96.4M
$360.0M
Q4 24
$107.5M
$658.4M
Q3 24
$196.5M
$333.0M
Q2 24
$482.6M
$679.3M
Free Cash Flow
J
J
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$364.9M
$293.5M
Q3 25
$353.5M
$151.8M
Q2 25
$270.5M
$283.0M
Q1 25
$-113.7M
$121.0M
Q4 24
$97.1M
$412.5M
Q3 24
$158.2M
$85.0M
Q2 24
$444.9M
$437.9M
FCF Margin
J
J
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
Q4 25
11.1%
6.5%
Q3 25
11.2%
3.4%
Q2 25
8.9%
6.6%
Q1 25
-3.9%
3.0%
Q4 24
3.3%
10.0%
Q3 24
-13.6%
2.1%
Q2 24
10.5%
11.2%
Capex Intensity
J
J
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
4.8%
Q4 25
0.5%
6.3%
Q3 25
0.9%
5.1%
Q2 25
0.7%
6.2%
Q1 25
0.6%
5.8%
Q4 24
0.4%
6.0%
Q3 24
-3.3%
6.3%
Q2 24
0.9%
6.2%
Cash Conversion
J
J
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
1.12×
Q4 25
3.03×
1.29×
Q3 25
3.13×
1.02×
Q2 25
1.63×
1.55×
Q1 25
-17.18×
1.14×
Q4 24
1.98×
Q3 24
0.60×
1.29×
Q2 24
3.28×
2.35×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

J
J

Infrastructure Advanced Facilities$2.9B89%
PA Consulting$354.4M11%

UHS
UHS

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons