vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Trane Technologies (TT) and Universal Health Services (UHS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Trane Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.1B vs $4.5B, roughly 1.1× Universal Health Services). Trane Technologies runs the higher net margin — 11.5% vs 8.0%, a 3.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Universal Health Services posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.2% vs 5.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Trane Technologies's revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs 7.3%).

Trane Technologies plc is an Irish domiciled company focused on heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) and refrigeration systems. The company traces its corporate history back more than 150 years and was created after a series of mergers and spin-offs. In 2008, HVAC manufacturer Trane was acquired by Ingersoll Rand, a US industrial tools manufacturer. In 2020, the tools business was spun off as Ingersoll Rand and the remaining company was renamed Trane Technologies.

Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) is an American Fortune 500 company that provides hospital and healthcare services, based in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. In 2024, UHS reported total revenues of $15.8 billion.

TT vs UHS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TT
TT
1.1× larger
TT
$5.1B
$4.5B
UHS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
UHS
UHS
+2.7% gap
UHS
8.2%
5.5%
TT
Higher net margin
TT
TT
3.5% more per $
TT
11.5%
8.0%
UHS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TT
TT
Annualised
TT
10.5%
7.3%
UHS

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
TT
TT
UHS
UHS
Revenue
$5.1B
$4.5B
Net Profit
$591.3M
$358.7M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
15.9%
11.2%
Net Margin
11.5%
8.0%
Revenue YoY
5.5%
8.2%
Net Profit YoY
-2.2%
11.5%
EPS (diluted)
$2.64
$5.65

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
TT
TT
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
$4.5B
Q4 25
$5.1B
$4.5B
Q3 25
$5.7B
$4.5B
Q2 25
$5.7B
$4.3B
Q1 25
$4.7B
$4.1B
Q4 24
$4.9B
$4.1B
Q3 24
$5.4B
$4.0B
Q2 24
$5.3B
$3.9B
Net Profit
TT
TT
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
$358.7M
Q4 25
$591.3M
$445.9M
Q3 25
$847.6M
$373.0M
Q2 25
$874.8M
$353.2M
Q1 25
$604.9M
$316.7M
Q4 24
$604.3M
$332.4M
Q3 24
$772.0M
$258.7M
Q2 24
$755.3M
$289.2M
Gross Margin
TT
TT
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
36.9%
Q2 25
37.6%
Q1 25
35.8%
Q4 24
Q3 24
36.3%
Q2 24
36.5%
Operating Margin
TT
TT
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
11.2%
Q4 25
15.9%
11.5%
Q3 25
20.3%
11.6%
Q2 25
20.3%
11.7%
Q1 25
17.5%
11.1%
Q4 24
16.6%
11.5%
Q3 24
18.8%
9.7%
Q2 24
19.5%
11.2%
Net Margin
TT
TT
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
8.0%
Q4 25
11.5%
9.9%
Q3 25
14.8%
8.3%
Q2 25
15.2%
8.2%
Q1 25
12.9%
7.7%
Q4 24
12.4%
8.1%
Q3 24
14.2%
6.5%
Q2 24
14.2%
7.4%
EPS (diluted)
TT
TT
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
$5.65
Q4 25
$2.64
$7.01
Q3 25
$3.78
$5.86
Q2 25
$3.89
$5.43
Q1 25
$2.67
$4.80
Q4 24
$2.65
$4.94
Q3 24
$3.39
$3.80
Q2 24
$3.30
$4.26

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
TT
TT
UHS
UHS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.8B
$119.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$4.6B
$4.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$8.6B
$7.5B
Total Assets
$21.4B
$15.7B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.54×
0.63×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
TT
TT
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
$119.0M
Q4 25
$1.8B
$137.8M
Q3 25
$112.9M
Q2 25
$137.6M
Q1 25
$126.8M
Q4 24
$1.6B
$126.0M
Q3 24
$106.1M
Q2 24
$128.8M
Total Debt
TT
TT
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
$4.7B
Q4 25
$4.6B
$4.8B
Q3 25
$4.7B
Q2 25
$4.6B
Q1 25
$4.6B
Q4 24
$4.8B
$4.5B
Q3 24
$4.7B
Q2 24
$4.5B
Stockholders' Equity
TT
TT
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
$7.5B
Q4 25
$8.6B
$7.3B
Q3 25
$8.3B
$7.2B
Q2 25
$7.8B
$7.0B
Q1 25
$7.5B
$6.8B
Q4 24
$7.5B
$6.7B
Q3 24
$7.6B
$6.6B
Q2 24
$6.9B
$6.5B
Total Assets
TT
TT
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
$15.7B
Q4 25
$21.4B
$15.5B
Q3 25
$21.4B
$15.3B
Q2 25
$21.0B
$15.0B
Q1 25
$20.1B
$14.9B
Q4 24
$20.1B
$14.5B
Q3 24
$20.9B
$14.4B
Q2 24
$20.2B
$14.1B
Debt / Equity
TT
TT
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
0.63×
Q4 25
0.54×
0.65×
Q3 25
0.66×
Q2 25
0.65×
Q1 25
0.68×
Q4 24
0.64×
0.68×
Q3 24
0.71×
Q2 24
0.69×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
TT
TT
UHS
UHS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$1.2B
$401.6M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
4.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.96×
1.12×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
TT
TT
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
$401.6M
Q4 25
$1.2B
$574.7M
Q3 25
$1.0B
$380.7M
Q2 25
$692.1M
$549.0M
Q1 25
$339.5M
$360.0M
Q4 24
$899.9M
$658.4M
Q3 24
$1.3B
$333.0M
Q2 24
$695.9M
$679.3M
Free Cash Flow
TT
TT
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$293.5M
Q3 25
$935.6M
$151.8M
Q2 25
$602.2M
$283.0M
Q1 25
$220.6M
$121.0M
Q4 24
$774.3M
$412.5M
Q3 24
$1.2B
$85.0M
Q2 24
$623.0M
$437.9M
FCF Margin
TT
TT
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
Q4 25
6.5%
Q3 25
16.3%
3.4%
Q2 25
10.5%
6.6%
Q1 25
4.7%
3.0%
Q4 24
15.9%
10.0%
Q3 24
22.3%
2.1%
Q2 24
11.7%
11.2%
Capex Intensity
TT
TT
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
4.8%
Q4 25
6.3%
Q3 25
1.2%
5.1%
Q2 25
1.6%
6.2%
Q1 25
2.5%
5.8%
Q4 24
2.6%
6.0%
Q3 24
1.6%
6.3%
Q2 24
1.4%
6.2%
Cash Conversion
TT
TT
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
1.12×
Q4 25
1.96×
1.29×
Q3 25
1.18×
1.02×
Q2 25
0.79×
1.55×
Q1 25
0.56×
1.14×
Q4 24
1.49×
1.98×
Q3 24
1.69×
1.29×
Q2 24
0.92×
2.35×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

TT
TT

Services$2.8B55%
Other$2.3B45%

UHS
UHS

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons