vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Janus International Group, Inc. (JBI) and PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (PCOR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($349.1M vs $219.3M, roughly 1.6× Janus International Group, Inc.). Janus International Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.9% vs -10.8%, a 17.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.6% vs -4.7%). PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($109.2M vs $8.3M). Over the past eight quarters, PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs -8.8%).
Janus Henderson is a British-American global asset management group headquartered in the City of London, United Kingdom. It offers a range of financial products to individuals, intermediary advisors, and institutional investors globally under the trade name Janus Henderson Investors.
Procore Technologies is an American construction management software as a service company founded in 2002, with headquarters in Carpinteria, California. Procore hosts a platform to connect those involved in the construction industry on a global platform. The software allows for the creation of simplified workflows and displays a consolidated view of construction products that includes the tracking of tasks, management of project workflows, and scheduling.
JBI vs PCOR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $219.3M | $349.1M |
| Net Profit | $15.2M | $-37.6M |
| Gross Margin | 39.1% | 80.1% |
| Operating Margin | 13.4% | -12.3% |
| Net Margin | 6.9% | -10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.7% | 15.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 28.8% | 39.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | $-0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $349.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $219.3M | $338.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.1M | $323.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $210.5M | $310.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $230.8M | $302.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $230.1M | $295.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $248.4M | $284.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $254.5M | $269.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-37.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.2M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.7M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.8M | $-33.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $300.0K | $-62.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $-26.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.6M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.7M | $-11.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 80.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.1% | 79.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.9% | 79.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.9% | 79.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.8% | 81.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.6% | 81.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.9% | 83.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.4% | 83.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -12.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.8% | -9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | -11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | -21.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.6% | -12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | -5.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.8% | -7.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | -2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.1% | -6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | -10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | -20.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.1% | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.1% | -4.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.15 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.08 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.19 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.21 | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $768.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $560.8M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $768.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $684.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $620.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $566.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $775.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $102.1M | $756.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $110.1M | $735.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $744.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $560.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $543.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $526.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $518.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $526.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $556.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $535.4M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $1.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.0M | $114.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.3M | $109.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.8% | 31.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.1% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.99× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $140.1M | $282.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $114.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $88.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.4M | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.3M | $66.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.4M | $29.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.0M | $39.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.0M | $58.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.6M | $69.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $109.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3M | $83.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.6M | $27.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.9M | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.3M | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.3M | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.3M | $56.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.0M | $67.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 31.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.6% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.6% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.1% | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.2% | 20.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.4% | 24.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.48× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.47× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 171.33× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.64× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.12× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.93× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JBI
| Self Storage New Construction | $72.3M | 33% |
| Commercial And Others | $65.5M | 30% |
| Self Storage R3 | $54.0M | 25% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $15.5M | 7% |
| Transferred Over Time | $12.8M | 6% |
PCOR
| US | $298.3M | 85% |
| Non Us | $50.9M | 15% |
