vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Janus International Group, Inc. (JBI) and Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Janus International Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($219.3M vs $143.3M, roughly 1.5× Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc.). Janus International Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.9% vs -31.4%, a 38.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.4% vs -4.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (0.0% CAGR vs -8.8%).
Janus Henderson is a British-American global asset management group headquartered in the City of London, United Kingdom. It offers a range of financial products to individuals, intermediary advisors, and institutional investors globally under the trade name Janus Henderson Investors.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
JBI vs PDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $219.3M | $143.3M |
| Net Profit | $15.2M | $-45.0M |
| Gross Margin | 39.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 13.4% | — |
| Net Margin | 6.9% | -31.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.7% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 28.8% | -27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $143.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $142.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $219.3M | $139.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.1M | $140.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $210.5M | $142.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $230.8M | $143.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $230.1M | $139.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $248.4M | $143.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-45.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-43.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.2M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.7M | $-16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.8M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $300.0K | $-30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.6M | $-9.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -31.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | -9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.1% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | -7.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | -20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | -8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.1% | -6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.15 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.08 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.19 | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $2.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $560.8M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $731.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $109.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $102.1M | $133.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $110.1M | $138.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $560.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $543.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $526.8M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $518.8M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $526.6M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $556.3M | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.1% | 110.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.99× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $140.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $140.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $35.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.4M | $50.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.3M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.4M | $198.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.0M | $42.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.0M | $66.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 110.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.48× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.47× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 171.33× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.64× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.12× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JBI
| Self Storage New Construction | $72.3M | 33% |
| Commercial And Others | $65.5M | 30% |
| Self Storage R3 | $54.0M | 25% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $15.5M | 7% |
| Transferred Over Time | $12.8M | 6% |
PDM
Segment breakdown not available.
