vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of J.Jill, Inc. (JILL) and Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
J.Jill, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($150.5M vs $93.7M, roughly 1.6× Ranpak Holdings Corp.). On growth, Ranpak Holdings Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.3% vs -0.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Ranpak Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs 0.1%).
J.Jill is an American womenswear retailer founded in 1955 in Massachusetts. It has been a publicly traded company since 2017. J.Jill is headquartered in Quincy, Massachusetts.
Ranpak Holdings Corp. manufactures machines and paper products used in protective paper-based packing for shipping goods and merchandise for e-commerce and industry, along with automation solutions. The company is based in Concord, Ohio, and has production facilities and offices in Reno, Nevada; Kansas City, Missouri; the Netherlands; Czech Republic; Shanghai and Singapore. The paper packaging material can be used for multiple applications like wrapping, cushioning, void fill and cold chain p...
JILL vs PACK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $150.5M | $93.7M |
| Net Profit | $9.2M | — |
| Gross Margin | 70.9% | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.9% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | 6.1% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -0.5% | 2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -25.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.60 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $150.5M | $93.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $154.0M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $153.6M | $77.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.8M | $77.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.3M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $155.2M | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $161.5M | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $150.3M | $72.5M |
| Q4 25 | $9.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.7M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.2M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.8M | $-8.1M |
| Q4 25 | 70.9% | 39.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 68.4% | 41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 71.8% | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 66.3% | 39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 71.4% | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 70.5% | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 72.9% | 43.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 67.5% | 44.6% |
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.9% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.4% | -12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.6% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.8% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.6% | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.0% | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | -12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.3% | -10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.3% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | -11.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.60 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.69 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.76 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.11 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.80 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.54 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.16 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.33 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $58.0M | $63.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $401.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $129.0M | $534.9M |
| Total Assets | $458.0M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.75× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $58.0M | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.5M | $49.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.2M | $49.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.4M | $65.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.8M | $76.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.5M | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $77.1M | $65.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $62.2M | $55.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $401.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $403.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $405.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $406.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $403.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $396.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $396.7M |
| Q4 25 | $129.0M | $534.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.5M | $537.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $112.0M | $539.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.8M | $544.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $103.3M | $548.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.4M | $564.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.1M | $566.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.2M | $560.0M |
| Q4 25 | $458.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $436.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $432.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $417.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $418.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $390.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $443.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $428.2M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.71× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $19.1M | $19.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.07× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $37.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.1M | $19.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.4M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.1M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.4M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.5M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.6M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $16.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.84× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.60× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.54× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | 3.56× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.39× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JILL
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $80.1M | 53% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $70.5M | 47% |
PACK
| Other | $47.9M | 51% |
| Europe And Asia Segment | $45.8M | 49% |
