vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of J.Jill, Inc. (JILL) and DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC (PLOW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($184.5M vs $150.5M, roughly 1.2× J.Jill, Inc.). DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs 6.1%, a 0.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.6% vs -0.5%). DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($92.8M vs $16.0M). Over the past eight quarters, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC's revenue compounded faster (38.9% CAGR vs 0.1%).
J.Jill is an American womenswear retailer founded in 1955 in Massachusetts. It has been a publicly traded company since 2017. J.Jill is headquartered in Quincy, Massachusetts.
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S. federal government...
JILL vs PLOW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $150.5M | $184.5M |
| Net Profit | $9.2M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | 70.9% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | 9.9% | 10.5% |
| Net Margin | 6.1% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.5% | 28.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -25.5% | 62.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.60 | $0.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $150.5M | $184.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $154.0M | $162.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $153.6M | $194.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.8M | $115.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.3M | $143.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $155.2M | $129.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $161.5M | $199.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $150.3M | $95.7M |
| Q4 25 | $9.2M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5M | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.7M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | $148.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.3M | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.2M | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $24.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.8M | $-8.4M |
| Q4 25 | 70.9% | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 68.4% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 71.8% | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 66.3% | 24.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 71.4% | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 70.5% | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 72.9% | 30.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 67.5% | 19.8% |
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.9% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.4% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.6% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.7% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.8% | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.6% | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.0% | -6.7% |
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.3% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.3% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | -8.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.60 | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.69 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.76 | $1.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.11 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.80 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.54 | $1.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.16 | $1.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.33 | $-0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $58.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $144.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $129.0M | $281.4M |
| Total Assets | $458.0M | $626.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $58.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $77.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $62.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $144.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $147.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $129.0M | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.5M | $275.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $112.0M | $273.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.8M | $258.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $103.3M | $264.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.4M | $260.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.1M | $236.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.2M | $217.2M |
| Q4 25 | $458.0M | $626.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $436.5M | $694.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $432.9M | $671.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $417.7M | $621.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $418.3M | $590.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $390.8M | $665.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $443.9M | $617.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $428.2M | $577.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $19.1M | $95.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.0M | $92.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.6% | 50.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.0% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.07× | 7.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $37.6M | $63.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.1M | $95.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.4M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.1M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.4M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.5M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.6M | $-21.6M |
| Q4 25 | $16.0M | $92.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.6M | $70.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.0M | $-15.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.8M | $836.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | $-22.4M |
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 50.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | -7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | -7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.7% | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | -11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | -23.4% |
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | 2.07× | 7.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.84× | -1.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.46× | -0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.60× | -9.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.54× | 9.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.00× | -0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | 0.10× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.39× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JILL
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $80.1M | 53% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $70.5M | 47% |
PLOW
| Work Truck Solutions | $101.5M | 55% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $83.1M | 45% |
