vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of J.Jill, Inc. (JILL) and ROGERS CORP (ROG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ROGERS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($200.5M vs $150.5M, roughly 1.3× J.Jill, Inc.). J.Jill, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.1% vs 2.2%, a 3.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ROGERS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.2% vs -0.5%). J.Jill, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($16.0M vs $1.1M). Over the past eight quarters, J.Jill, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (0.1% CAGR vs -3.3%).
J.Jill is an American womenswear retailer founded in 1955 in Massachusetts. It has been a publicly traded company since 2017. J.Jill is headquartered in Quincy, Massachusetts.
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
JILL vs ROG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $150.5M | $200.5M |
| Net Profit | $9.2M | $4.5M |
| Gross Margin | 70.9% | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | 9.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 6.1% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.5% | 5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -25.5% | 421.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.60 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $200.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $150.5M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $154.0M | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $153.6M | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.8M | $190.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.3M | $192.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $155.2M | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $161.5M | $214.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.2M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.7M | $-73.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.3M | $-500.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.2M | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $8.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 70.9% | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 68.4% | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 71.8% | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 66.3% | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 71.4% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 70.5% | 35.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 72.9% | 34.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.9% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.4% | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.6% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.7% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.8% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.6% | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | -36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.3% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.3% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.60 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.69 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.76 | $-4.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.11 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.80 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.54 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.16 | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $58.0M | $195.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $129.0M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $458.0M | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $195.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $58.0M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.5M | $167.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.2M | $157.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.4M | $175.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.8M | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.5M | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $77.1M | $119.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $129.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $112.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $103.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.1M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $458.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $436.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $432.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $417.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $418.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $390.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $443.9M | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $19.1M | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.0M | $1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.6% | 0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.0% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.07× | 1.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $37.6M | $70.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.1M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.4M | $28.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.1M | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.4M | $42.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.5M | $22.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.0M | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.6M | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.0M | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.8M | $8.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.7% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.2% | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.07× | 10.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.84× | 3.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.60× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.54× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.00× | 3.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | 2.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JILL
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $80.1M | 53% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $70.5M | 47% |
ROG
Segment breakdown not available.
