vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of J.Jill, Inc. (JILL) and Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tecnoglass Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($245.3M vs $150.5M, roughly 1.6× J.Jill, Inc.). Tecnoglass Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.6% vs 6.1%, a 4.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tecnoglass Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.4% vs -0.5%). J.Jill, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($16.0M vs $11.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Tecnoglass Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.8% CAGR vs 0.1%).
J.Jill is an American womenswear retailer founded in 1955 in Massachusetts. It has been a publicly traded company since 2017. J.Jill is headquartered in Quincy, Massachusetts.
Tecnoglass Inc. is a leading manufacturer of high-performance architectural glass, aluminum windows, doors, and associated building components. It primarily caters to residential and commercial construction sectors across North America and Latin America, offering custom, energy-efficient solutions for new construction and renovation projects.
JILL vs TGLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $150.5M | $245.3M |
| Net Profit | $9.2M | $26.1M |
| Gross Margin | 70.9% | 40.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.9% | 18.3% |
| Net Margin | 6.1% | 10.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.5% | 2.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -25.5% | -44.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.60 | $0.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $150.5M | $245.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $154.0M | $260.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $153.6M | $255.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.8M | $222.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.3M | $239.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $155.2M | $238.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $161.5M | $219.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $150.3M | $192.6M |
| Q4 25 | $9.2M | $26.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.7M | $44.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.3M | $47.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.2M | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.8M | $29.7M |
| Q4 25 | 70.9% | 40.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 68.4% | 42.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 71.8% | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 66.3% | 43.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 71.4% | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 70.5% | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 72.9% | 40.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 67.5% | 38.8% |
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 18.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.9% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.4% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.6% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.7% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.8% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.6% | 23.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.0% | 21.3% |
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.3% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.3% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.60 | $0.57 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.69 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.76 | $0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.11 | $0.90 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.80 | $1.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.54 | $1.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.16 | $0.75 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.33 | $0.63 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $58.0M | $104.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $174.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $129.0M | $713.1M |
| Total Assets | $458.0M | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $58.0M | $104.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.5M | $127.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.2M | $140.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.4M | $160.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.8M | $137.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.5M | $124.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $77.1M | $129.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $62.2M | $138.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $174.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $114.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $110.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $110.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $111.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $126.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $144.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $160.9M |
| Q4 25 | $129.0M | $713.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.5M | $764.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $112.0M | $736.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.8M | $685.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $103.3M | $631.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.4M | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.1M | $574.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.2M | $573.6M |
| Q4 25 | $458.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $436.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $432.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $417.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $418.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $390.8M | $996.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $443.9M | $942.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $428.2M | $981.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.28× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $19.1M | $31.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.0M | $11.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.6% | 4.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.0% | 8.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.07× | 1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $37.6M | $34.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.1M | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.4M | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1M | $46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.1M | $61.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.4M | $41.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.5M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.6M | $33.4M |
| Q4 25 | $16.0M | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1M | $-14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.6M | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.0M | $17.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.8M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | $23.6M |
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | -5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.7% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.2% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | 12.2% |
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | 5.1% |
| Q4 25 | 2.07× | 1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.84× | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.46× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.60× | 1.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.54× | 1.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.00× | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.39× | 1.13× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JILL
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $80.1M | 53% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $70.5M | 47% |
TGLS
| Product Sales | $164.2M | 67% |
| Fixed Price Contracts | $81.1M | 33% |
| Related Party | $692.0K | 0% |
