vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. (JKS) and Take-Two Interactive (TTWO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5B vs $1.7B, roughly 1.5× Take-Two Interactive). Over the past eight quarters, Take-Two Interactive's revenue compounded faster (10.2% CAGR vs -23.1%).
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. is a solar module manufacturer headquartered in Shanghai, China, and listed on the New York Stock Exchange since 2010. Its subsidiary Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. was listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange's Science and Technology Innovation Board in 2022.
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. is an American video game holding company based in New York City founded by Ryan Brant in September 1993.
JKS vs TTWO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.5B | $1.7B |
| Net Profit | — | $-92.9M |
| Gross Margin | 0.3% | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | -2.3% |
| Net Margin | — | -5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 24.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 25.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $1.3B |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-92.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-133.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-125.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-365.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-262.0M |
| Q2 26 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 55.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 55.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.3% | 62.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 55.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | 53.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.1% | 57.6% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -238.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -13.8% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -235.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -27.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -19.6% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-21.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.52 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $2.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $3.5B |
| Total Assets | — | $10.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $879.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.0B |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $10.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $305.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $236.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 13.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $487.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $305.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $128.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-44.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $279.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-128.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-191.0M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $236.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $96.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-69.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $224.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-48.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-165.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-226.1M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -12.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -16.9% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.6% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
