vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JONES LANG LASALLE INC (JLL) and Stanley Black & Decker (SWK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
JONES LANG LASALLE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.4B vs $3.8B, roughly 1.7× Stanley Black & Decker). JONES LANG LASALLE INC runs the higher net margin — 2.5% vs 1.4%, a 1.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JONES LANG LASALLE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.1% vs 0.1%). Stanley Black & Decker produced more free cash flow last quarter ($155.3M vs $-819.9M). Over the past eight quarters, JONES LANG LASALLE INC's revenue compounded faster (6.5% CAGR vs 0.3%).
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) is a global real estate services company headquartered in Chicago. The company has offices in 80 countries. It offers investment management services worldwide, including services to institutional and retail investors, and to high-net-worth individuals, as well as technology products through JLL Technologies, and venture capital investments through its PropTech fund, JLL Spark. The company is ranked 188 on the Fortune 500.
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., formerly known as The Stanley Works, is an American manufacturer of industrial tools and household hardware, and a provider of security products. Headquartered in the Greater Hartford city of New Britain, Connecticut, Stanley Black & Decker is the result of the merger of The Stanley Works and Black & Decker on March 12, 2010.
JLL vs SWK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.4B | $3.8B |
| Net Profit | $159.0M | $51.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 31.4% |
| Operating Margin | 3.2% | — |
| Net Margin | 2.5% | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.1% | 0.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -43.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.33 | $0.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $6.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6B | $4.0B |
| Q1 26 | $159.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $401.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $222.4M | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $110.5M | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.5M | $90.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.2M | $194.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $155.1M | $91.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.4M | $-11.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 30.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 28.4% |
| Q1 26 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 9.5% |
| Q1 26 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.5% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | -0.3% |
| Q1 26 | $3.33 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.33 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.61 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.32 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.14 | $0.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.98 | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.20 | $0.60 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.75 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $436.2M | $268.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.4B | $9.0B |
| Total Assets | $17.9B | $21.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.59× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $436.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $599.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $428.9M | $268.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $401.4M | $311.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $432.4M | $344.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $416.3M | $290.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $437.8M | $298.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $424.4M | $318.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.1B |
| Q1 26 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0B | $9.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8B | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.6B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4B | $8.7B |
| Q1 26 | $17.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $17.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.2B | $21.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $22.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6B | $22.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.8B | $21.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.8B | $22.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.9B | $22.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-17.7M | $221.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-819.9M | $155.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -12.8% | 4.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.11× | 4.30× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $369.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-17.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $617.1M | $221.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $332.8M | $214.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-767.6M | $-420.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $927.3M | $679.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $261.6M | $285.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $273.9M | $573.0M |
| Q1 26 | $-819.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $155.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $134.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-485.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $564.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $485.8M |
| Q1 26 | -12.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | -0.11× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.52× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.77× | 4.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.01× | 2.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.35× | -4.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.84× | 3.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.69× | 3.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.25× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JLL
| Real Estate Management Services | $5.1B | 79% |
| Leasing Advisory | $686.3M | 11% |
| Capital Markets Services | $535.2M | 8% |
| Investment Management | $99.3M | 2% |
SWK
| Tools And Outdoor Segment | $3.3B | 87% |
| Engineered Fastening Segment | $500.5M | 13% |
