vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of James River Group Holdings, Inc. (JRVR) and KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC (KLIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($199.6M vs $167.7M, roughly 1.2× James River Group Holdings, Inc.). James River Group Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 19.1% vs 8.4%, a 10.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, James River Group Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.4% vs 20.2%). KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-11.6M vs $-23.6M).
James River Corporation was an American pulp and paper company based in Richmond, Virginia, once the largest paper manufacturer in the world.
Kulicke & Soffa Industries Inc. is a leading global provider of semiconductor packaging and assembly equipment, materials, and process solutions. It serves semiconductor manufacturers across automotive electronics, consumer devices, industrial systems, and high-performance computing markets, with core offerings covering wire bonding and advanced packaging technologies.
JRVR vs KLIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $167.7M | $199.6M |
| Net Profit | $32.1M | $16.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 49.6% |
| Operating Margin | 14.6% | 8.9% |
| Net Margin | 19.1% | 8.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.4% | 20.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 149.5% | -79.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.59 | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $199.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $167.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $172.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $174.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $172.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $126.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $191.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $188.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $16.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-64.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-39.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 49.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -57.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -27.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -51.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -20.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.59 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.44 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.10 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $260.9M | $481.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $538.2M | $825.0M |
| Total Assets | $4.9B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $481.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $260.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $238.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $220.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $279.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $362.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $359.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $672.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $825.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $538.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $503.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $492.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $484.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $460.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $530.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $541.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.8M | $-8.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-23.6M | $-11.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -14.1% | -5.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | 1.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.59× | -0.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-17.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-8.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-18.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-51.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-247.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-269.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $-11.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-23.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-52.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-252.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-270.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -5.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | -14.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -198.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -141.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -0.53× | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.59× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.61× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.29× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.38× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.14× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JRVR
| Excess And Surplus Lines | $156.7M | 93% |
| Specialty Admitted Insurance | $10.9M | 7% |
KLIC
| Ball Bonding Equipment Segment | $110.3M | 55% |
| Aftermarket Products And Services APS Segment Post Cessation | $45.1M | 23% |
| Wedge Bonding Equipment Segment | $21.1M | 11% |
| Automotiveand Industrial | $13.6M | 7% |
| All Others Segment | $11.4M | 6% |