vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Jianzhi Education Technology Group Co Ltd (JZ) and Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Jianzhi Education Technology Group Co Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1M vs $881.5K, roughly 1.2× Serve Robotics Inc.). Jianzhi Education Technology Group Co Ltd runs the higher net margin — -111.1% vs -3888.1%, a 3777.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. Jianzhi Education Technology Group Co Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.8M vs $-46.1M).
Jianzhi Education Technology Group Co Ltd is a China-based education technology provider focused on vocational training services. It offers professional qualification exam preparation courses, practical skill upgrading programs, and digital learning resources tailored for learners across industries including finance, information technology, and education, serving primarily the domestic Chinese market.
Ecovacs Robotics is a Chinese technology company. It is best known for developing in-home robotic appliances. The company was founded in 1998 by Qian Dongqi and is headquartered in Suzhou, China. According to Global Asia, Ecovacs Robotics had more than 60% of the Chinese market for robots by 2013. In 2023, Nikkei Asia had reported that the market capitalisation of Ecovacs Robotics has grown to near $6.38 billion, which is "roughly 5 times" that of the market capitalisation of rivalling US bas...
JZ vs SERV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1M | $881.5K |
| Net Profit | $-1.2M | $-34.3M |
| Gross Margin | 19.8% | -757.3% |
| Operating Margin | -115.2% | -4572.1% |
| Net Margin | -111.1% | -3888.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 400.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -161.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $881.5K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $687.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1M | $642.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $440.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $176.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $222.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | $468.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $946.7K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-34.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-33.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.2M | $-20.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-13.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-13.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-8.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-9.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | -757.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -637.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | -445.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -333.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -371.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -70.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.9% | 30.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 62.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | -4572.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -5067.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -115.2% | -3527.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3406.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -7701.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -3804.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1828.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -814.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -3888.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -4806.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -111.1% | -3247.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3000.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -7441.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -3601.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1931.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -954.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.27 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $985.5K | $106.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.1M | $350.7M |
| Total Assets | $8.0M | $367.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $106.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $116.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $985.5K | $116.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $197.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $123.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $50.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $28.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $350.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $283.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $207.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $210.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $131.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $56.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $961.1K | $28.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-8.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $367.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $299.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.0M | $214.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $216.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $139.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $61.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | $32.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.8M | $-29.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.8M | $-46.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -171.5% | -5234.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 1872.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-117.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-29.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-25.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.8M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-9.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-5.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-46.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-36.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.8M | $-22.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-12.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | -5234.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -5314.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -171.5% | -3426.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2934.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6307.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4529.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1396.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -431.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1872.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1649.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 940.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 785.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2755.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2070.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 169.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.4% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
