vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KAISER ALUMINUM CORP (KALU) and UNITED THERAPEUTICS Corp (UTHR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KAISER ALUMINUM CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($929.0M vs $790.2M, roughly 1.2× UNITED THERAPEUTICS Corp). UNITED THERAPEUTICS Corp runs the higher net margin — 46.1% vs 3.0%, a 43.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KAISER ALUMINUM CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.4% vs 7.4%). UNITED THERAPEUTICS Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($173.3M vs $-51.1M). Over the past eight quarters, KAISER ALUMINUM CORP's revenue compounded faster (12.2% CAGR vs 8.0%).
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation is an American aluminum producer. It is a spinoff from Kaiser Aluminum and Chemicals Corporation, which came to be when common stock was offered in Permanente Metals Corporation and Permanente Metals Corporation's name was changed to Kaiser Aluminum and Chemicals Corporation.
United Therapeutics Corporation is an American biotechnology company that develops pharmaceuticals and technologies related to organ transplantation, including xenotransplantation. Many of the company's products are focused towards lung disease and organ manufacturing. United Therapeutics is co-headquartered in Silver Spring, Maryland and Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, with additional facilities in Magog and Bromont, Quebec; Melbourne and Jacksonville, Florida; Blacksburg, Virginia; ...
KALU vs UTHR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $929.0M | $790.2M |
| Net Profit | $28.2M | $364.3M |
| Gross Margin | 13.3% | 86.9% |
| Operating Margin | 6.5% | 45.1% |
| Net Margin | 3.0% | 46.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.4% | 7.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 42.4% | 20.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.67 | $7.66 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $929.0M | $790.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $843.5M | $799.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $823.1M | $798.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $777.4M | $794.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $765.4M | $735.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $747.7M | $748.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $773.4M | $714.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $737.5M | $677.7M |
| Q4 25 | $28.2M | $364.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.5M | $338.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $309.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.6M | $322.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.8M | $301.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.8M | $309.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.9M | $278.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.2M | $306.6M |
| Q4 25 | 13.3% | 86.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.6% | 87.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.2% | 89.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.4% | 88.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.5% | 89.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | 88.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.4% | 89.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.7% | 89.2% |
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | 45.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 45.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.3% | 48.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 48.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.3% | 52.6% |
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 46.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | 42.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 38.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 40.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 40.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | 38.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.5% | 45.2% |
| Q4 25 | $1.67 | $7.66 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.38 | $7.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.41 | $6.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.31 | $6.63 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.21 | $6.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.54 | $6.39 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.15 | $5.85 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.12 | $6.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.0M | $2.9B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $826.1M | $7.1B |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $7.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.2M | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.1M | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.3M | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.4M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.7M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.4M | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.6M | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | $826.1M | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $806.1M | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $776.0M | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $756.8M | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $743.1M | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $729.4M | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $727.6M | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $714.7M | $5.3B |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $7.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $7.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $6.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $6.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-20.6M | $346.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-51.1M | $173.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.5% | 21.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.3% | 21.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.73× | 0.95× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-25.5M | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-20.6M | $346.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $59.1M | $562.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.9M | $191.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.0M | $461.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.4M | $341.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.1M | $377.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.3M | $232.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.3M | $376.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-51.1M | $173.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.5M | $351.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-27.7M | $129.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.8M | $386.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-12.6M | $254.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-17.0M | $300.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-17.4M | $187.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.3M | $338.3M |
| Q4 25 | -5.5% | 21.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 44.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.4% | 16.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 48.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.6% | 34.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.3% | 40.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.2% | 26.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.5% | 49.9% |
| Q4 25 | 3.3% | 21.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 26.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 9.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.3% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.7% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.1% | 5.6% |
| Q4 25 | -0.73× | 0.95× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.50× | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.69× | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.64× | 1.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.19× | 1.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.88× | 1.22× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.39× | 0.83× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.48× | 1.23× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KALU
| Packaging | $440.6M | 47% |
| Aero Hs Products | $213.0M | 23% |
| Transferred Over Time | $200.2M | 22% |
| Automotive Extrusions | $75.4M | 8% |
UTHR
| Tyvaso DPI | $338.6M | 43% |
| Remodulin | $128.0M | 16% |
| Nebulized Tyvaso | $125.7M | 16% |
| Orenitram | $121.2M | 15% |
| Unituxin | $62.3M | 8% |
| Adcirca | $7.8M | 1% |
| Other | $6.6M | 1% |
