vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KB HOME (KBH) and Take-Two Interactive (TTWO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Take-Two Interactive is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $1.7B, roughly 1.0× KB HOME). KB HOME runs the higher net margin — 6.0% vs -5.5%, a 11.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Take-Two Interactive posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.9% vs -15.3%). KB HOME produced more free cash flow last quarter ($290.1M vs $236.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Take-Two Interactive's revenue compounded faster (10.2% CAGR vs 7.4%).
KB Home is an American homebuilding company founded in 1957 as Kaufman & Broad in Detroit, Michigan. It was the first company to be traded on the New York Stock Exchange as a home builder. Its headquarters are in Los Angeles, California.
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. is an American video game holding company based in New York City founded by Ryan Brant in September 1993.
KBH vs TTWO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7B | $1.7B |
| Net Profit | $101.5M | $-92.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | -2.3% |
| Net Margin | 6.0% | -5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -15.3% | 24.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -46.7% | 25.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.55 | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $101.5M | $-92.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.8M | $-133.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.9M | $-11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $109.6M | $-3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $190.6M | $-125.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $157.3M | $-365.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $168.4M | $-262.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $138.7M | $-2.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | 55.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 55.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 62.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 55.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 53.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 57.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 33.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -238.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -13.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -193.9% |
| Q4 25 | 6.0% | -5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | -7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.1% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | -235.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | -9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | -27.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | -19.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.4% | -207.4% |
| Q4 25 | $1.55 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.61 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.50 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.49 | $-21.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.50 | $-0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.04 | $-2.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.15 | $-1.52 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.76 | $-17.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $2.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.9B | $3.5B |
| Total Assets | $6.7B | $10.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $879.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $776.0M |
| Q4 25 | $3.9B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9B | $5.7B |
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $10.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0B | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0B | $9.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9B | $12.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8B | $13.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8B | $12.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.7B | $12.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $303.8M | $305.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $290.1M | $236.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 17.1% | 13.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.99× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $287.3M | $487.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $303.8M | $305.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $197.7M | $128.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.4M | $-44.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-334.3M | $279.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $362.6M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-89.9M | $-128.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $61.5M | $-191.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.5M | $-8.9M |
| Q4 25 | $290.1M | $236.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $185.8M | $96.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $156.9M | $-69.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-345.5M | $224.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $352.6M | $-48.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-99.4M | $-165.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.2M | $-226.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.1M | $-55.1M |
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.3% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.8% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.6% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.7% | -12.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | -16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | -3.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.99× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.80× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.90× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.57× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.21× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KBH
| Home Building | $1.7B | 99% |
| Financial Service | $8.7M | 1% |
TTWO
Segment breakdown not available.