vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KeyCorp (KEY) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Roper Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $2.0B, roughly 1.0× KeyCorp). KeyCorp runs the higher net margin — 25.4% vs 15.8%, a 9.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KeyCorp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (131.8% vs 11.3%). KeyCorp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.1B vs $507.0M). Over the past eight quarters, KeyCorp's revenue compounded faster (14.4% CAGR vs 10.5%).
Key is a Japanese visual novel studio known for making dramatic and plot-oriented titles. It was formed on July 21, 1998, as a brand under the publisher Visual Arts, and is located in Kita, Osaka.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
KEY vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $510.0M | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 32.3% | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | 25.4% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 131.8% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 309.0% | 53.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.43 | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $865.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $695.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $510.0M | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $489.0M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $425.0M | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $405.0M | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-244.0M | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-410.0M | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $274.0M | $337.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.3% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.8% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.3% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.0% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -92.6% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -72.8% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.0% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.4% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.1% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.8% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -54.7% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -59.0% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.0% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.43 | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.41 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.35 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.33 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.30 | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.47 | $3.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.2B | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $9.9B | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $20.4B | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $184.4B | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.49× | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.2B | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.3B | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.6B | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.3B | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.5B | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.8B | $269.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.5B | $251.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.9B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.1B | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.9B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.4B | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.1B | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.5B | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.0B | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.2B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.9B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $184.4B | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $187.4B | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $185.5B | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $188.7B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $187.2B | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $189.8B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.4B | $29.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.49× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.67× | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.93× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.14× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.2B | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.1B | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 104.8% | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.3% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.33× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $3.5B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $396.0M | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-140.0M | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $664.0M | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.2B | $755.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-217.0M | $384.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $367.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-150.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $599.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-230.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 104.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 69.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -175.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -15.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.33× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.81× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.90× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.35× | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.79× | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
