vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Keysight Technologies (KEYS) and Lamb Weston (LW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lamb Weston is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.1× Keysight Technologies). Keysight Technologies runs the higher net margin — 16.4% vs 3.5%, a 13.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Keysight Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.3% vs 2.9%). Keysight Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($187.0M vs $-36.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Keysight Technologies's revenue compounded faster (6.2% CAGR vs -1.5%).
Keysight Technologies, Inc. is an American company that manufactures electronics test and measurement equipment and software. The company was formed as a spin-off of Agilent Technologies, which inherited and rebranded the test and measurement product lines developed and produced, from the late 1960s to the turn of the millennium, by Hewlett-Packard's Test and Measurement division. Its name is a portmanteau of key and insight.
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. is an American food processing company that is one of the world's largest producers and processors of frozen french fries, waffle fries, and other frozen potato products. It is headquartered in Eagle, Idaho, a suburb of Boise.
KEYS vs LW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.6B |
| Net Profit | $233.0M | $54.0M |
| Gross Margin | 61.2% | 21.2% |
| Operating Margin | 15.3% | 8.1% |
| Net Margin | 16.4% | 3.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.3% | 2.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 419.2% | -63.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.35 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $54.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $233.0M | $62.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.0M | $64.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $257.0M | $119.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $169.0M | $146.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-73.0M | $-36.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $389.0M | $127.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.0M | $129.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 61.2% | 20.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 61.7% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.3% | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 63.2% | 27.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 62.3% | 17.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 62.0% | 21.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 62.7% | 24.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.3% | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.3% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.8% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.8% | 16.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.8% | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 13.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.4% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.1% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.7% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.0% | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.7% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | 8.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.39 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.35 | $0.44 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.10 | $0.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.49 | $0.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.97 | $1.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.41 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.22 | $0.88 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.72 | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9B | $57.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.5B | $3.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.9B | $1.8B |
| Total Assets | $11.3B | $7.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.43× | 1.99× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $57.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $82.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $98.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $70.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $67.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $79.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $120.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $71.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $3.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.3B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.7B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5B | $7.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.4B | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.3B | $7.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.3B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0B | $7.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.99× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.43× | 2.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.45× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.46× | 2.12× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | 2.25× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | 2.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.34× | 1.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.37× | 1.92× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $225.0M | $65.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $187.0M | $-36.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 13.2% | -2.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 6.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.97× | 1.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.3B | $569.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $65.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $225.0M | $178.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $322.0M | $352.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $484.0M | $868.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $378.0M | $56.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $359.0M | $99.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $255.0M | $330.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $110.0M | $798.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-36.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $187.0M | $101.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $291.0M | $274.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $457.0M | $230.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $346.0M | $-19.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $321.0M | $-49.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $222.0M | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $74.0M | $-131.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.0% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.7% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.9% | -3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.1% | -8.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | 38.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.7% | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 57.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.21× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.97× | 2.87× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.69× | 5.47× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.88× | 7.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.24× | 0.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.66× | 2.59× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.87× | 6.16× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KEYS
| Transferred At Point In Time | $790.0M | 56% |
| Electronicindustrial | $429.0M | 30% |
| Transferred Over Time | $200.0M | 14% |
LW
| Segments North America | $1.0B | 66% |
| Segments International | $529.8M | 34% |
