vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KFORCE INC (KFRC) and WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC (WTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($625.1M vs $330.4M, roughly 1.9× KFORCE INC). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 13.4% vs 2.4%, a 11.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs 0.1%). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($140.3M vs $-7.4M). Over the past eight quarters, WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (4.6% CAGR vs -3.7%).
Kforce Inc. is a professional staffing and solutions firm headquartered in the United States. It provides skilled professional placements and specialized workforce solutions primarily across technology, finance & accounting, and healthcare segments, serving a wide range of mid-sized to large enterprise clients nationwide.
AERCO International, Inc. is a manufacturer and supplier of commercial condensing boilers, high efficiency water heating equipment and energy recovery systems in the HVAC/plumbing industry across a variety of markets including education, lodging, government, office buildings, healthcare, industrial and multifamily housing. In 1949, AERCO introduced the industry's first semi-instantaneous, tankless steam-to-water water heater. In 1988, AERCO introduced the first condensing and fully modulating...
KFRC vs WTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $330.4M | $625.1M |
| Net Profit | $7.9M | $83.7M |
| Gross Margin | 27.3% | 49.5% |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | 18.2% |
| Net Margin | 2.4% | 13.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.1% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -2.7% | 24.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.46 | $2.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $330.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $332.0M | $625.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $332.6M | $611.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $334.3M | $643.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $330.0M | $558.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $343.8M | $540.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $353.3M | $543.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $356.3M | $597.3M |
| Q1 26 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.2M | $83.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4M | $100.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1M | $74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1M | $67.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.2M | $82.0M |
| Q1 26 | 27.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.2% | 49.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.7% | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.1% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.7% | 48.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.0% | 46.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.9% | 47.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.8% | 47.7% |
| Q1 26 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 15.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.3% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 18.7% |
| Q1 26 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 13.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.46 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.29 | $2.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.63 | $2.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.59 | $3.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.45 | $2.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.60 | $2.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.75 | $2.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $2.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3M | $405.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $117.4M | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $384.8M | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1M | $405.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | $457.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | $369.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $444.0K | $336.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $349.0K | $386.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.0K | $303.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $110.0K | $279.4M |
| Q1 26 | $117.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $124.6M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.1M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $134.4M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $154.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $167.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $166.6M | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $384.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $365.6M | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.2M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $373.6M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $368.2M | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $357.8M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $369.9M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.7M | $2.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $154.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-7.4M | $140.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.2% | 22.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $43.3M | $356.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.7M | $154.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.3M | $122.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | $69.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $249.0K | $55.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.8M | $139.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.0M | $90.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.9M | $85.3M |
| Q1 26 | $-7.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.7M | $140.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.8M | $110.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.2M | $59.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.9M | $127.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.5M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.8M | $78.5M |
| Q1 26 | -2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.0% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.2% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.8% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.0% | 13.1% |
| Q1 26 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 1.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.82× | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.11× | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.76× | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.97× | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.48× | 1.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
