vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Classover Holdings, Inc. (KIDZ) and Laser Photonics Corp (LASE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Laser Photonics Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($919.3K vs $537.1K, roughly 1.7× Classover Holdings, Inc.). Laser Photonics Corp runs the higher net margin — -506.4% vs -1005.8%, a 499.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Classover Holdings, Inc. is an education technology company that provides live interactive online learning courses targeted primarily at children aged 3 to 12. Its core service portfolio includes STEM, language learning, arts, and social skill development programs, with main markets covering the United States and global Chinese-speaking family segments.
IPG Photonics Corporation is a manufacturer of fiber lasers. IPG Photonics developed and commercialized optical fiber lasers, which are used in a variety of applications including materials processing, medical applications and telecommunications. IPG has manufacturing facilities in the United States, Germany, Russia and Italy.
KIDZ vs LASE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $537.1K | $919.3K |
| Net Profit | $-5.4M | $-4.7M |
| Gross Margin | 54.1% | -20.1% |
| Operating Margin | -184.7% | -350.0% |
| Net Margin | -1005.8% | -506.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 28.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -186.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $537.1K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | $919.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $725.6K | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $816.0K | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $716.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $623.4K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $743.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-5.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.9M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-297.2K | $-1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $586.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-934.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-545.7K |
| Q4 25 | 54.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 69.8% | -20.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.5% | 53.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.7% | 49.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 85.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 51.9% |
| Q4 25 | -184.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -47.0% | -350.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -234.1% | -37.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -36.3% | -68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -255.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -238.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -149.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -73.8% |
| Q4 25 | -1005.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 195.8% | -506.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -532.8% | -68.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -36.4% | -73.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -226.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -149.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -73.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $3.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.8M | $4.1M |
| Total Assets | $15.5M | $17.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $78.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $179.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $533.9K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $3.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.8M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.4M |
| Q4 25 | $15.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.6M | $17.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.1M | $14.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8M | $16.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $13.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-652.2K | $763.1K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-652.2K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.5M | $763.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-336.5K | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-288.3K | $-1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $632.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-866.3K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $589.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 82.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -388.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -136.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.01× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -11.11× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
