vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and loanDepot, Inc. (LDI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $310.3M, roughly 1.8× loanDepot, Inc.). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs -7.2%, a 37.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, loanDepot, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.5% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, loanDepot, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (18.0% CAGR vs 5.6%).
Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.
LoanDepot, sometimes stylized as loanDepot, is an Irvine, California-based nonbank holding company which sells mortgage and non-mortgage lending products.
KIM vs LDI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $558.0M | $310.3M |
| Net Profit | $166.3M | $-22.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 37.2% | -10.3% |
| Net Margin | 29.8% | -7.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.0% | 20.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 23.7% | 32.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.46 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $558.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $542.5M | $310.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $535.9M | $323.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $525.2M | $282.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.6M | $273.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $525.4M | $257.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $507.6M | $314.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $500.2M | $265.4M |
| Q1 26 | $166.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $151.2M | $-22.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.8M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $163.0M | $-13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.8M | $-21.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $166.0M | $-33.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.0M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.7M | $-32.2M |
| Q1 26 | 37.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 36.4% | -10.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.9% | -3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.2% | -11.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.6% | -16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.7% | -32.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.1% | -29.1% |
| Q1 26 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.9% | -7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.7% | -1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.0% | -4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | -8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.6% | -12.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | -12.1% |
| Q1 26 | $0.46 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.18 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $337.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.4B | $386.0M |
| Total Assets | $19.6B | $6.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 5.44× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $211.6M | $337.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.3M | $459.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $226.6M | $408.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.3M | $371.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $688.6M | $421.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $789.0M | $483.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.4M | $533.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | $10.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.4B | $386.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5B | $433.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5B | $439.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.6B | $469.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.7B | $506.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.5B | $592.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.6B | $578.9M |
| Q1 26 | $19.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.7B | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.9B | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.8B | $6.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.7B | $6.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.3B | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.5B | $5.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.74× | 5.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.70× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | 4.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.41× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-638.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-648.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -208.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-734.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $258.4M | $-638.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $332.4M | $43.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $305.4M | $67.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.8M | $-179.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.5M | $47.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $295.9M | $-349.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $294.1M | $-278.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-648.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $38.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $61.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $205.4M | $-186.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $40.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-356.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-285.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -208.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.3% | -68.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -113.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -107.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.69× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | -255.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.46× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KIM
| Revenues from rental properties, net | $552.8M | 99% |
| Management and other fee income | $5.2M | 1% |
LDI
Segment breakdown not available.
