vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and MDU RESOURCES GROUP INC (MDU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $522.6M, roughly 1.1× MDU RESOURCES GROUP INC). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 14.6%, a 15.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimco Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.0% vs -1.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (5.6% CAGR vs -5.7%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. is a U.S.-based corporation supplying products and services to regulated energy delivery and utilities related construction materials and services businesses. It is headquartered in Bismarck, North Dakota, and operates in 48 states.

KIM vs MDU — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.1× larger
KIM
$558.0M
$522.6M
MDU
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KIM
KIM
+5.6% gap
KIM
4.0%
-1.6%
MDU
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
15.2% more per $
KIM
29.8%
14.6%
MDU
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KIM
KIM
Annualised
KIM
5.6%
-5.7%
MDU

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
KIM
KIM
MDU
MDU
Revenue
$558.0M
$522.6M
Net Profit
$166.3M
$76.3M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
37.2%
20.5%
Net Margin
29.8%
14.6%
Revenue YoY
4.0%
-1.6%
Net Profit YoY
23.7%
38.4%
EPS (diluted)
$0.46
$0.37

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
MDU
MDU
Q1 26
$558.0M
Q4 25
$542.5M
$522.6M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$313.6M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$348.7M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$678.0M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$531.0M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$290.7M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$343.1M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
MDU
MDU
Q1 26
$166.3M
Q4 25
$151.2M
$76.3M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$18.3M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$13.8M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$82.0M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$55.2M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$64.6M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$60.4M
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
MDU
MDU
Q1 26
37.2%
Q4 25
36.4%
20.5%
Q3 25
34.9%
12.7%
Q2 25
39.2%
8.7%
Q1 25
33.6%
16.6%
Q4 24
31.7%
17.8%
Q3 24
33.7%
12.0%
Q2 24
32.1%
11.5%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
MDU
MDU
Q1 26
29.8%
Q4 25
27.9%
14.6%
Q3 25
25.7%
5.8%
Q2 25
31.0%
4.0%
Q1 25
24.8%
12.1%
Q4 24
31.6%
10.4%
Q3 24
26.8%
22.2%
Q2 24
23.9%
17.6%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
MDU
MDU
Q1 26
$0.46
Q4 25
$0.37
Q3 25
$0.09
Q2 25
$0.07
Q1 25
$0.40
Q4 24
$0.26
Q3 24
$0.32
Q2 24
$0.30

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
MDU
MDU
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$28.2M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$2.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$2.8B
Total Assets
$19.6B
$7.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.97×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
MDU
MDU
Q1 26
Q4 25
$211.6M
$28.2M
Q3 25
$159.3M
$75.9M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$58.8M
Q1 25
$131.3M
$59.5M
Q4 24
$688.6M
$66.9M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$88.3M
Q2 24
$126.4M
$78.8M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
MDU
MDU
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.7B
$2.7B
Q3 25
$2.4B
Q2 25
$2.2B
Q1 25
$2.2B
Q4 24
$8.0B
$2.3B
Q3 24
$2.3B
Q2 24
$2.3B
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
MDU
MDU
Q1 26
$10.4B
Q4 25
$10.4B
$2.8B
Q3 25
$10.5B
$2.7B
Q2 25
$10.5B
$2.7B
Q1 25
$10.6B
$2.7B
Q4 24
$10.7B
$2.7B
Q3 24
$10.5B
$3.1B
Q2 24
$10.6B
$3.0B
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
MDU
MDU
Q1 26
$19.6B
Q4 25
$19.7B
$7.6B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$7.2B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$6.9B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$7.0B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$7.0B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$8.2B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$8.0B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
MDU
MDU
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
0.97×
Q3 25
0.86×
Q2 25
0.80×
Q1 25
0.80×
Q4 24
0.75×
0.85×
Q3 24
0.76×
Q2 24
0.75×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
MDU
MDU
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$80.6M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-336.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-64.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
79.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.06×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-297.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
MDU
MDU
Q1 26
Q4 25
$258.4M
$80.6M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$57.9M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$117.4M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$217.5M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$60.5M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$140.2M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$136.5M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
MDU
MDU
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-336.0M
Q3 25
$-121.9M
Q2 25
$36.5M
Q1 25
$205.4M
$124.4M
Q4 24
$-95.8M
Q3 24
$673.0K
Q2 24
$26.5M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
MDU
MDU
Q1 26
Q4 25
-64.3%
Q3 25
-38.9%
Q2 25
10.5%
Q1 25
38.3%
18.4%
Q4 24
-18.0%
Q3 24
0.2%
Q2 24
7.7%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
MDU
MDU
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.0%
79.7%
Q3 25
0.0%
57.3%
Q2 25
0.0%
23.2%
Q1 25
3.4%
13.7%
Q4 24
29.4%
Q3 24
48.0%
Q2 24
32.0%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
MDU
MDU
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.71×
1.06×
Q3 25
2.41×
3.16×
Q2 25
1.87×
8.52×
Q1 25
1.69×
2.65×
Q4 24
1.44×
1.10×
Q3 24
2.18×
2.17×
Q2 24
2.46×
2.26×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

MDU
MDU

Natural Gas Distribution$382.8M73%
Commercial Utility Sales$42.7M8%
Residential Utility Sales$33.7M6%
Pipelineand Midstream$31.1M6%
Natural Gas Transportation$17.2M3%
Industrial Utility Sales$10.1M2%
Natural Gas Storage$6.4M1%
Other Utility Sales$1.9M0%

Related Comparisons