vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and Noble Corp plc (NE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Noble Corp plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($764.4M vs $558.0M, roughly 1.4× Kimco Realty). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 11.3%, a 18.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimco Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.0% vs -17.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Noble Corp plc's revenue compounded faster (9.5% CAGR vs 5.6%).
Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.
Barnes & Noble Booksellers is an American bookseller with the largest number of retail outlets in the United States. The company operates approximately 700+ retail stores across the United States.
KIM vs NE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $558.0M | $764.4M |
| Net Profit | $166.3M | $86.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 37.2% | 5.6% |
| Net Margin | 29.8% | 11.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.0% | -17.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 23.7% | -10.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.46 | $0.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $558.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $542.5M | $764.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $535.9M | $798.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $525.2M | $848.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.6M | $874.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $525.4M | $927.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $507.6M | $800.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $500.2M | $692.8M |
| Q1 26 | $166.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $151.2M | $86.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.8M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $163.0M | $42.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.8M | $108.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $166.0M | $96.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.0M | $61.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.7M | $195.0M |
| Q1 26 | 37.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 36.4% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.9% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.2% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.6% | 21.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.7% | 18.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.7% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.1% | 30.3% |
| Q1 26 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.9% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.7% | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.0% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 12.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.6% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.8% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 28.1% |
| Q1 26 | $0.46 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.27 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.67 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.56 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $471.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.4B | $4.5B |
| Total Assets | $19.6B | $7.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $211.6M | $471.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.3M | $477.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $226.6M | $338.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.3M | $303.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $688.6M | $247.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $789.0M | $391.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.4M | $162.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $10.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.4B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.6B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.7B | $4.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.5B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.6B | $4.0B |
| Q1 26 | $19.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.7B | $7.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.9B | $7.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.8B | $7.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.7B | $7.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.3B | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1B | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.5B | $5.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $187.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $35.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 4.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 19.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.16× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $432.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $258.4M | $187.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $332.4M | $277.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $305.4M | $216.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.8M | $271.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.5M | $136.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $295.9M | $283.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $294.1M | $106.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $139.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $99.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $205.4M | $157.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $156.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-34.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.3% | 18.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.71× | 2.16× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.87× | 5.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.69× | 2.50× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.44× | 1.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | 4.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.46× | 0.55× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KIM
| Revenues from rental properties, net | $552.8M | 99% |
| Management and other fee income | $5.2M | 1% |
NE
| Floaters | $559.8M | 73% |
| Jackups | $145.5M | 19% |
| Service Other | $59.1M | 8% |