vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and NU SKIN ENTERPRISES, INC. (NUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $370.3M, roughly 1.5× NU SKIN ENTERPRISES, INC.). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 3.9%, a 25.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimco Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.0% vs -16.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (5.6% CAGR vs -5.8%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. is an American multilevel marketing company that develops and sells personal care products and dietary and nutritional supplements. Under the Nu Skin and Pharmanex brands, the company sells its products in 54 markets through a network of approximately 1.2 million independent distributors.

KIM vs NUS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.5× larger
KIM
$558.0M
$370.3M
NUS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KIM
KIM
+20.9% gap
KIM
4.0%
-16.9%
NUS
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
25.9% more per $
KIM
29.8%
3.9%
NUS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KIM
KIM
Annualised
KIM
5.6%
-5.8%
NUS

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
KIM
KIM
NUS
NUS
Revenue
$558.0M
$370.3M
Net Profit
$166.3M
$14.5M
Gross Margin
70.7%
Operating Margin
37.2%
6.3%
Net Margin
29.8%
3.9%
Revenue YoY
4.0%
-16.9%
Net Profit YoY
23.7%
140.1%
EPS (diluted)
$0.46
$0.27

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
NUS
NUS
Q1 26
$558.0M
Q4 25
$542.5M
$370.3M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$364.2M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$386.1M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$364.5M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$445.6M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$430.1M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$439.1M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
NUS
NUS
Q1 26
$166.3M
Q4 25
$151.2M
$14.5M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$17.1M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$21.1M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$107.5M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$-36.1M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$8.3M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$-118.3M
Gross Margin
KIM
KIM
NUS
NUS
Q1 26
Q4 25
70.7%
Q3 25
70.5%
Q2 25
68.8%
Q1 25
67.8%
Q4 24
62.7%
Q3 24
70.1%
Q2 24
70.0%
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
NUS
NUS
Q1 26
37.2%
Q4 25
36.4%
6.3%
Q3 25
34.9%
5.9%
Q2 25
39.2%
8.0%
Q1 25
33.6%
-2.7%
Q4 24
31.7%
-11.9%
Q3 24
33.7%
4.2%
Q2 24
32.1%
-28.6%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
NUS
NUS
Q1 26
29.8%
Q4 25
27.9%
3.9%
Q3 25
25.7%
4.7%
Q2 25
31.0%
5.5%
Q1 25
24.8%
29.5%
Q4 24
31.6%
-8.1%
Q3 24
26.8%
1.9%
Q2 24
23.9%
-26.9%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
NUS
NUS
Q1 26
$0.46
Q4 25
$0.27
Q3 25
$0.34
Q2 25
$0.43
Q1 25
$2.14
Q4 24
$-0.73
Q3 24
$0.17
Q2 24
$-2.38

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
NUS
NUS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$239.8M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$805.2M
Total Assets
$19.6B
$1.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
NUS
NUS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$211.6M
$239.8M
Q3 25
$159.3M
$253.0M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$265.4M
Q1 25
$131.3M
$213.6M
Q4 24
$688.6M
$198.0M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$237.8M
Q2 24
$126.4M
$232.9M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
NUS
NUS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.7B
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$8.0B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
NUS
NUS
Q1 26
$10.4B
Q4 25
$10.4B
$805.2M
Q3 25
$10.5B
$799.8M
Q2 25
$10.5B
$787.8M
Q1 25
$10.6B
$754.0M
Q4 24
$10.7B
$651.5M
Q3 24
$10.5B
$706.9M
Q2 24
$10.6B
$686.2M
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
NUS
NUS
Q1 26
$19.6B
Q4 25
$19.7B
$1.4B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$1.4B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$1.4B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$1.4B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$1.5B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$1.6B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$1.6B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
NUS
NUS
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.75×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
NUS
NUS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$16.6M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$5.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
1.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.9%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.15×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$46.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
NUS
NUS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$258.4M
$16.6M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$27.5M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$35.8M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$389.0K
Q4 24
$239.5M
$25.8M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$31.4M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$51.2M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
NUS
NUS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$5.9M
Q3 25
$17.6M
Q2 25
$35.8M
Q1 25
$205.4M
$-13.2M
Q4 24
$13.2M
Q3 24
$22.8M
Q2 24
$43.1M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
NUS
NUS
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.6%
Q3 25
4.8%
Q2 25
9.3%
Q1 25
38.3%
-3.6%
Q4 24
3.0%
Q3 24
5.3%
Q2 24
9.8%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
NUS
NUS
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.0%
2.9%
Q3 25
0.0%
2.7%
Q2 25
0.0%
0.0%
Q1 25
3.4%
3.7%
Q4 24
2.8%
Q3 24
2.0%
Q2 24
1.9%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
NUS
NUS
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.71×
1.15×
Q3 25
2.41×
1.61×
Q2 25
1.87×
1.69×
Q1 25
1.69×
0.00×
Q4 24
1.44×
Q3 24
2.18×
3.79×
Q2 24
2.46×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

NUS
NUS

Other$161.9M44%
Mainland China Segment$52.0M14%
Southeast Asia Pacific Segment$50.5M14%
Europe And Africa Segment$41.8M11%
Hong Kong Taiwan Segment$29.6M8%
South Korea Segment$28.4M8%
Rhyz Other Segment$6.1M2%

Related Comparisons