vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and PRA GROUP INC (PRAA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $333.4M, roughly 1.7× PRA GROUP INC). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 17.0%, a 12.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PRA GROUP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.7% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, PRA GROUP INC's revenue compounded faster (14.2% CAGR vs 5.6%).
Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.
PRA Group, Inc. is a publicly traded debt buyer and debt collection company based in Norfolk, Virginia. The company buys delinquent consumer debt from credit card issuers and other financial institutions at a discount and pursues collection of the full debt owed. Founded in 1996, PRA Group employs more than 3200 people in 18 countries.
KIM vs PRAA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $558.0M | $333.4M |
| Net Profit | $166.3M | $56.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 37.2% | 37.7% |
| Net Margin | 29.8% | 17.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.0% | 13.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 23.7% | 206.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.46 | $1.47 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $558.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $542.5M | $333.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $535.9M | $311.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $525.2M | $287.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.6M | $269.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $525.4M | $293.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $507.6M | $281.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $500.2M | $284.2M |
| Q1 26 | $166.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $151.2M | $56.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.8M | $-407.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $163.0M | $42.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.8M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $166.0M | $18.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.0M | $27.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.7M | $21.5M |
| Q1 26 | 37.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 36.4% | 37.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.9% | -101.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.2% | 29.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.6% | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.7% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.7% | 32.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.1% | 31.4% |
| Q1 26 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.9% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.7% | -131.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.0% | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.6% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.8% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 7.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.46 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.47 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-10.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.47 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.54 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $104.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.4B | $979.9M |
| Total Assets | $19.6B | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $211.6M | $104.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.3M | $107.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $226.6M | $131.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.3M | $128.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $688.6M | $105.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $789.0M | $141.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.4M | $118.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $10.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.4B | $979.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5B | $928.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.6B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $19.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.7B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.9B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.8B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.7B | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.3B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1B | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.5B | $4.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-85.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-90.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -27.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -1.51× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-169.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $258.4M | $-85.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $332.4M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $305.4M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.8M | $-52.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.5M | $-94.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $295.9M | $-35.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $294.1M | $-29.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-90.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-11.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $205.4M | $-53.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-98.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-36.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-30.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.3% | -19.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -12.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -10.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.71× | -1.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.87× | -0.30× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.69× | -14.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.44× | -5.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | -1.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.46× | -1.37× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KIM
| Revenues from rental properties, net | $552.8M | 99% |
| Management and other fee income | $5.2M | 1% |
PRAA
| GB | $170.1M | 51% |
| Other | $163.3M | 49% |
