vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and SouthState Bank Corp (SSB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SouthState Bank Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($661.7M vs $542.5M, roughly 1.2× Kimco Realty). SouthState Bank Corp runs the higher net margin — 34.1% vs 27.9%, a 6.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, SouthState Bank Corp's revenue compounded faster (37.4% CAGR vs 3.8%).
Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.
SouthState Bank, based in Winter Haven, Florida, is an American bank and a subsidiary of SouthState Corporation, a bank holding company. As of May 26, 2025, the company had 371 branches in South Carolina, North Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Virginia, Colorado and Texas.
KIM vs SSB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $542.5M | $661.7M |
| Net Profit | $151.2M | $225.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 36.4% | 15.1% |
| Net Margin | 27.9% | 34.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.2% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.0% | 153.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $2.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $661.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $542.5M | $581.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $535.9M | $599.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $525.2M | $577.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.6M | $544.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $525.4M | $369.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $507.6M | $351.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $500.2M | $350.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $225.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $151.2M | $247.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.8M | $246.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $163.0M | $215.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.8M | $89.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $166.0M | $144.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.0M | $143.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.7M | $132.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 36.4% | 54.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.9% | 53.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.2% | 48.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.6% | 22.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.7% | 50.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.7% | 53.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.1% | 49.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.9% | 42.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.7% | 41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.0% | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 16.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.6% | 39.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.8% | 40.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 37.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.28 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.47 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.42 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.87 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.86 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.73 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $211.6M | $2.9B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $7.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.4B | $9.0B |
| Total Assets | $19.7B | $68.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.74× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $211.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $226.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $688.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $789.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.4B | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5B | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5B | $8.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.6B | $8.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.7B | $5.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.5B | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.6B | $5.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $68.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.7B | $67.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.9B | $66.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.8B | $65.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.7B | $65.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.3B | $46.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1B | $46.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.5B | $45.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $258.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.71× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $258.4M | $232.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $332.4M | $122.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $305.4M | $72.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.8M | $-126.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.5M | $354.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $295.9M | $-246.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $294.1M | $126.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $215.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $101.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $52.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $205.4M | $-139.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $340.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-254.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $117.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.3% | -25.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 92.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -72.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.71× | 0.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.41× | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.87× | 0.34× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.69× | -1.42× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.44× | 2.46× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | -1.72× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.46× | 0.96× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KIM
Segment breakdown not available.
SSB
| Net Interest Income | $561.6M | 85% |
| Noninterest Income | $100.1M | 15% |
