vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP (SXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($542.5M vs $435.8M, roughly 1.2× SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs 10.1%, a 17.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (54.2% vs 3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP's revenue compounded faster (3.9% CAGR vs 3.8%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

Sensient Technologies is a global manufacturer and marketer of colors, flavors and fragrances based in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Their products are used in many foods and beverages, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, home and personal care products, specialty printing and imaging products, computer imaging and industrial colors. Sensient reported revenue of $1,468 million in 2013. Subdivisions include the Sensient Flavors & Fragrances Group and the Sensient Color Group. Within the Flavors & Fragrances G...

KIM vs SXT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.2× larger
KIM
$542.5M
$435.8M
SXT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
SXT
SXT
+50.9% gap
SXT
54.2%
3.2%
KIM
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
17.7% more per $
KIM
27.9%
10.1%
SXT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
SXT
SXT
Annualised
SXT
3.9%
3.8%
KIM

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
KIM
KIM
SXT
SXT
Revenue
$542.5M
$435.8M
Net Profit
$151.2M
$44.2M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
36.4%
15.3%
Net Margin
27.9%
10.1%
Revenue YoY
3.2%
54.2%
Net Profit YoY
-9.0%
28.2%
EPS (diluted)
$1.04

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
SXT
SXT
Q1 26
$435.8M
Q4 25
$542.5M
$393.4M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$412.1M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$414.2M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$392.3M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$376.4M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$392.6M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$403.5M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
SXT
SXT
Q1 26
$44.2M
Q4 25
$151.2M
$25.5M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$37.0M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$37.6M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$34.5M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$30.1M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$32.7M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$30.9M
Gross Margin
KIM
KIM
SXT
SXT
Q1 26
Q4 25
31.4%
Q3 25
34.3%
Q2 25
34.5%
Q1 25
33.6%
Q4 24
31.7%
Q3 24
33.2%
Q2 24
32.4%
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
SXT
SXT
Q1 26
15.3%
Q4 25
36.4%
9.7%
Q3 25
34.9%
14.0%
Q2 25
39.2%
13.9%
Q1 25
33.6%
13.6%
Q4 24
31.7%
11.2%
Q3 24
33.7%
12.9%
Q2 24
32.1%
12.3%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
SXT
SXT
Q1 26
10.1%
Q4 25
27.9%
6.5%
Q3 25
25.7%
9.0%
Q2 25
31.0%
9.1%
Q1 25
24.8%
8.8%
Q4 24
31.6%
8.0%
Q3 24
26.8%
8.3%
Q2 24
23.9%
7.7%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
SXT
SXT
Q1 26
$1.04
Q4 25
$0.60
Q3 25
$0.87
Q2 25
$0.88
Q1 25
$0.81
Q4 24
$0.71
Q3 24
$0.77
Q2 24
$0.73

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
SXT
SXT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$211.6M
$38.5M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$7.7B
$767.8M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$1.2B
Total Assets
$19.7B
$2.3B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.74×
0.63×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
SXT
SXT
Q1 26
$38.5M
Q4 25
$211.6M
$36.5M
Q3 25
$159.3M
$42.7M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$56.7M
Q1 25
$131.3M
$32.6M
Q4 24
$688.6M
$26.6M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$37.0M
Q2 24
$126.4M
$30.3M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
SXT
SXT
Q1 26
$767.8M
Q4 25
$7.7B
$709.2M
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$8.0B
$613.5M
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
SXT
SXT
Q1 26
$1.2B
Q4 25
$10.4B
$1.2B
Q3 25
$10.5B
$1.2B
Q2 25
$10.5B
$1.2B
Q1 25
$10.6B
$1.1B
Q4 24
$10.7B
$1.1B
Q3 24
$10.5B
$1.1B
Q2 24
$10.6B
$1.1B
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
SXT
SXT
Q1 26
$2.3B
Q4 25
$19.7B
$2.2B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$2.2B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$2.2B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$2.1B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$2.0B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$2.0B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$2.0B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
SXT
SXT
Q1 26
0.63×
Q4 25
0.74×
0.59×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.75×
0.58×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
SXT
SXT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$258.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.71×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
SXT
SXT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$258.4M
$44.6M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$44.0M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$48.3M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$-9.0M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$21.4M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$76.8M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$43.8M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
SXT
SXT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$12.9M
Q3 25
$24.2M
Q2 25
$27.1M
Q1 25
$205.4M
$-25.8M
Q4 24
$-1.7M
Q3 24
$63.6M
Q2 24
$32.0M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
SXT
SXT
Q1 26
Q4 25
3.3%
Q3 25
5.9%
Q2 25
6.5%
Q1 25
38.3%
-6.6%
Q4 24
-0.5%
Q3 24
16.2%
Q2 24
7.9%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
SXT
SXT
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.0%
8.0%
Q3 25
0.0%
4.8%
Q2 25
0.0%
5.1%
Q1 25
3.4%
4.3%
Q4 24
6.1%
Q3 24
3.4%
Q2 24
2.9%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
SXT
SXT
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.71×
1.75×
Q3 25
2.41×
1.19×
Q2 25
1.87×
1.28×
Q1 25
1.69×
-0.26×
Q4 24
1.44×
0.71×
Q3 24
2.18×
2.35×
Q2 24
2.46×
1.42×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons