vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and Bio-Techne (TECH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($542.5M vs $311.4M, roughly 1.7× Bio-Techne). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs 16.4%, a 11.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimco Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs -1.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (3.8% CAGR vs 1.3%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

Bio-Techne Corporation is an American life sciences company that develops, manufactures and sells life science reagents, instruments and services for the research, diagnostic, and bioprocessing markets.

KIM vs TECH — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.7× larger
KIM
$542.5M
$311.4M
TECH
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KIM
KIM
+4.8% gap
KIM
3.2%
-1.5%
TECH
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
11.5% more per $
KIM
27.9%
16.4%
TECH
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KIM
KIM
Annualised
KIM
3.8%
1.3%
TECH

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
KIM
KIM
TECH
TECH
Revenue
$542.5M
$311.4M
Net Profit
$151.2M
$51.0M
Gross Margin
66.9%
Operating Margin
36.4%
24.2%
Net Margin
27.9%
16.4%
Revenue YoY
3.2%
-1.5%
Net Profit YoY
-9.0%
126.0%
EPS (diluted)
$0.32

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
TECH
TECH
Q1 26
$311.4M
Q4 25
$542.5M
$295.9M
Q3 25
$535.9M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$317.0M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$316.2M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$297.0M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$289.5M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$306.1M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
TECH
TECH
Q1 26
$51.0M
Q4 25
$151.2M
$38.0M
Q3 25
$137.8M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$-17.7M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$22.6M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$34.9M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$33.6M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$40.6M
Gross Margin
KIM
KIM
TECH
TECH
Q1 26
66.9%
Q4 25
64.6%
Q3 25
Q2 25
62.7%
Q1 25
67.9%
Q4 24
65.3%
Q3 24
63.2%
Q2 24
66.4%
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
TECH
TECH
Q1 26
24.2%
Q4 25
36.4%
18.4%
Q3 25
34.9%
Q2 25
39.2%
-7.5%
Q1 25
33.6%
12.2%
Q4 24
31.7%
16.0%
Q3 24
33.7%
13.8%
Q2 24
32.1%
15.0%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
TECH
TECH
Q1 26
16.4%
Q4 25
27.9%
12.8%
Q3 25
25.7%
Q2 25
31.0%
-5.6%
Q1 25
24.8%
7.1%
Q4 24
31.6%
11.7%
Q3 24
26.8%
11.6%
Q2 24
23.9%
13.3%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
TECH
TECH
Q1 26
$0.32
Q4 25
$0.24
Q3 25
Q2 25
$-0.11
Q1 25
$0.14
Q4 24
$0.22
Q3 24
$0.21
Q2 24
$0.26

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
TECH
TECH
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$211.6M
$209.8M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$7.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$2.1B
Total Assets
$19.7B
$2.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.74×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
TECH
TECH
Q1 26
$209.8M
Q4 25
$211.6M
$172.9M
Q3 25
$159.3M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$162.2M
Q1 25
$131.3M
$140.7M
Q4 24
$688.6M
$177.5M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$187.5M
Q2 24
$126.4M
$152.9M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
TECH
TECH
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.7B
$260.0M
Q3 25
Q2 25
$346.0M
Q1 25
$330.0M
Q4 24
$8.0B
$300.0M
Q3 24
$300.0M
Q2 24
$319.0M
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
TECH
TECH
Q1 26
$2.1B
Q4 25
$10.4B
$2.0B
Q3 25
$10.5B
Q2 25
$10.5B
$1.9B
Q1 25
$10.6B
$2.0B
Q4 24
$10.7B
$2.1B
Q3 24
$10.5B
$2.1B
Q2 24
$10.6B
$2.1B
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
TECH
TECH
Q1 26
$2.6B
Q4 25
$19.7B
$2.5B
Q3 25
$19.9B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$2.6B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$2.6B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$2.7B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$2.7B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$2.7B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
TECH
TECH
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
0.13×
Q3 25
Q2 25
0.18×
Q1 25
0.16×
Q4 24
0.75×
0.14×
Q3 24
0.14×
Q2 24
0.15×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
TECH
TECH
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$258.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.71×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
TECH
TECH
Q1 26
Q4 25
$258.4M
Q3 25
$332.4M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$98.2M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$41.1M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$84.3M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$63.9M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$75.5M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
TECH
TECH
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
$93.3M
Q1 25
$205.4M
$31.0M
Q4 24
$77.5M
Q3 24
$54.7M
Q2 24
$57.5M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
TECH
TECH
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
29.4%
Q1 25
38.3%
9.8%
Q4 24
26.1%
Q3 24
18.9%
Q2 24
18.8%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
TECH
TECH
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.0%
Q3 25
0.0%
Q2 25
0.0%
1.5%
Q1 25
3.4%
3.2%
Q4 24
2.3%
Q3 24
3.2%
Q2 24
5.9%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
TECH
TECH
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.71×
Q3 25
2.41×
Q2 25
1.87×
Q1 25
1.69×
1.82×
Q4 24
1.44×
2.42×
Q3 24
2.18×
1.90×
Q2 24
2.46×
1.86×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Segment breakdown not available.

TECH
TECH

Protein Sciences segment revenue$226.2M73%
Diagnostics and Spatial Biology segment revenue$85.6M27%
Other revenue (1)$5.4M2%

Related Comparisons