vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and INTERFACE INC (TILE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $349.4M, roughly 1.6× INTERFACE INC). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 7.0%, a 22.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INTERFACE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.3% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, INTERFACE INC's revenue compounded faster (9.8% CAGR vs 5.6%).
Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.
Interface, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global manufacturer of commercial flooring. The company sells modular carpet tiles, luxury vinyl tile, and Nora brand rubber flooring.
KIM vs TILE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $558.0M | $349.4M |
| Net Profit | $166.3M | $24.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | 37.2% | 10.1% |
| Net Margin | 29.8% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.0% | 4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 23.7% | 12.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.46 | $0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $558.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $542.5M | $349.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $535.9M | $364.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $525.2M | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.6M | $297.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $525.4M | $335.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $507.6M | $344.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $500.2M | $346.6M |
| Q1 26 | $166.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $151.2M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.8M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $163.0M | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.8M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $166.0M | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.0M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.7M | $22.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.4% |
| Q1 26 | 37.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 36.4% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.9% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.2% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.6% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.7% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.7% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.1% | 11.0% |
| Q1 26 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.9% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.7% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.0% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.6% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.8% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 6.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.46 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $71.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $181.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.4B | $640.7M |
| Total Assets | $19.6B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $211.6M | $71.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.3M | $187.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $226.6M | $121.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.3M | $97.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $688.6M | $99.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $789.0M | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.4M | $94.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.7B | $181.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $307.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $304.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $302.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0B | $302.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $337.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $387.6M |
| Q1 26 | $10.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.4B | $640.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5B | $621.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5B | $575.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.6B | $513.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.7B | $489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.5B | $501.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.6B | $451.2M |
| Q1 26 | $19.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.5B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.74× | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.86× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $49.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $28.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $121.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $258.4M | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $332.4M | $76.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $305.4M | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.8M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.5M | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $295.9M | $76.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $294.1M | $21.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $28.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $66.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $205.4M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.71× | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.41× | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.87× | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.69× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.44× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | 2.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.46× | 0.95× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KIM
| Revenues from rental properties, net | $552.8M | 99% |
| Management and other fee income | $5.2M | 1% |
TILE
| AMS | $205.9M | 59% |
| EAAA | $143.5M | 41% |
