vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and Tyler Technologies (TYL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Tyler Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($613.5M vs $558.0M, roughly 1.1× Kimco Realty). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 13.2%, a 16.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tyler Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.6% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Tyler Technologies's revenue compounded faster (6.5% CAGR vs 5.6%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

Tyler Technologies, Inc. is an American technology company based in Plano, Texas, that provides proprietary software to the U.S. public sector. Tyler Technologies has offices in 17 states and one in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

KIM vs TYL — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TYL
TYL
1.1× larger
TYL
$613.5M
$558.0M
KIM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TYL
TYL
+4.6% gap
TYL
8.6%
4.0%
KIM
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
16.6% more per $
KIM
29.8%
13.2%
TYL
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TYL
TYL
Annualised
TYL
6.5%
5.6%
KIM

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
KIM
KIM
TYL
TYL
Revenue
$558.0M
$613.5M
Net Profit
$166.3M
$81.2M
Gross Margin
48.3%
Operating Margin
37.2%
16.3%
Net Margin
29.8%
13.2%
Revenue YoY
4.0%
8.6%
Net Profit YoY
23.7%
EPS (diluted)
$0.46
$1.88

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
$558.0M
$613.5M
Q4 25
$542.5M
$575.2M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$595.9M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$596.1M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$565.2M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$541.1M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$543.3M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$541.0M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
$166.3M
$81.2M
Q4 25
$151.2M
$65.5M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$84.4M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$84.6M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$81.1M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$65.2M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$75.9M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$67.7M
Gross Margin
KIM
KIM
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
48.3%
Q4 25
45.5%
Q3 25
47.2%
Q2 25
45.8%
Q1 25
47.3%
Q4 24
43.8%
Q3 24
43.7%
Q2 24
44.0%
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
37.2%
16.3%
Q4 25
36.4%
13.0%
Q3 25
34.9%
16.4%
Q2 25
39.2%
16.0%
Q1 25
33.6%
15.8%
Q4 24
31.7%
13.2%
Q3 24
33.7%
15.2%
Q2 24
32.1%
14.4%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
29.8%
13.2%
Q4 25
27.9%
11.4%
Q3 25
25.7%
14.2%
Q2 25
31.0%
14.2%
Q1 25
24.8%
14.3%
Q4 24
31.6%
12.1%
Q3 24
26.8%
14.0%
Q2 24
23.9%
12.5%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
$0.46
$1.88
Q4 25
$1.50
Q3 25
$1.93
Q2 25
$1.93
Q1 25
$1.84
Q4 24
$1.48
Q3 24
$1.74
Q2 24
$1.57

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
TYL
TYL
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$346.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$3.6B
Total Assets
$19.6B
$4.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
$346.4M
Q4 25
$211.6M
$1.1B
Q3 25
$159.3M
$950.8M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$892.3M
Q1 25
$131.3M
$807.4M
Q4 24
$688.6M
$768.0M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$544.3M
Q2 24
$126.4M
$258.0M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.7B
$599.7M
Q3 25
$599.2M
Q2 25
$598.8M
Q1 25
$598.4M
Q4 24
$8.0B
$597.9M
Q3 24
$597.5M
Q2 24
$597.1M
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
$10.4B
$3.6B
Q4 25
$10.4B
$3.7B
Q3 25
$10.5B
$3.6B
Q2 25
$10.5B
$3.6B
Q1 25
$10.6B
$3.5B
Q4 24
$10.7B
$3.4B
Q3 24
$10.5B
$3.3B
Q2 24
$10.6B
$3.1B
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
$19.6B
$4.8B
Q4 25
$19.7B
$5.6B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$5.5B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$5.4B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$5.2B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$5.2B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$5.0B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$4.8B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
0.16×
Q3 25
0.17×
Q2 25
0.16×
Q1 25
0.17×
Q4 24
0.75×
0.18×
Q3 24
0.18×
Q2 24
0.19×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
TYL
TYL
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$107.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$2.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
0.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.32×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$585.7M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
$107.3M
Q4 25
$258.4M
$243.9M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$255.2M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$98.3M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$56.2M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$224.8M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$263.7M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$64.3M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
$2.0M
Q4 25
$239.6M
Q3 25
$251.3M
Q2 25
$92.8M
Q1 25
$205.4M
$53.8M
Q4 24
$221.0M
Q3 24
$260.8M
Q2 24
$57.7M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
0.3%
Q4 25
41.7%
Q3 25
42.2%
Q2 25
15.6%
Q1 25
38.3%
9.5%
Q4 24
40.8%
Q3 24
48.0%
Q2 24
10.7%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.0%
0.8%
Q3 25
0.0%
0.7%
Q2 25
0.0%
0.9%
Q1 25
3.4%
0.4%
Q4 24
0.7%
Q3 24
0.5%
Q2 24
1.2%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
1.32×
Q4 25
1.71×
3.72×
Q3 25
2.41×
3.02×
Q2 25
1.87×
1.16×
Q1 25
1.69×
0.69×
Q4 24
1.44×
3.45×
Q3 24
2.18×
3.47×
Q2 24
2.46×
0.95×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

TYL
TYL

Subscriptions$429.7M70%
Maintenance$108.9M18%
Other$74.9M12%

Related Comparisons