vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and ZIFF DAVIS, INC. (ZD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $406.7M, roughly 1.4× ZIFF DAVIS, INC.). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 0.1%, a 29.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimco Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.0% vs -1.5%). Over the past eight quarters, ZIFF DAVIS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs 5.6%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

Ziff Davis, Inc. is an American digital media and Internet company. Founded in 1927 by William Bernard Ziff Sr. and Bernard George Davis, the company primarily owns technology- and health-oriented media websites, online shopping-related services, Internet connectivity services, gaming and entertainment brands, and cybersecurity and martech tools. Previously, the company was predominantly a publisher of hobbyist magazines.

KIM vs ZD — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.4× larger
KIM
$558.0M
$406.7M
ZD
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KIM
KIM
+5.5% gap
KIM
4.0%
-1.5%
ZD
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
29.7% more per $
KIM
29.8%
0.1%
ZD
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
ZD
ZD
Annualised
ZD
13.7%
5.6%
KIM

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
KIM
KIM
ZD
ZD
Revenue
$558.0M
$406.7M
Net Profit
$166.3M
$370.0K
Gross Margin
85.9%
Operating Margin
37.2%
21.2%
Net Margin
29.8%
0.1%
Revenue YoY
4.0%
-1.5%
Net Profit YoY
23.7%
-99.4%
EPS (diluted)
$0.46
$0.06

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
ZD
ZD
Q1 26
$558.0M
Q4 25
$542.5M
$406.7M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$363.7M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$352.2M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$328.6M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$412.8M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$353.6M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$320.8M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
ZD
ZD
Q1 26
$166.3M
Q4 25
$151.2M
$370.0K
Q3 25
$137.8M
$-3.6M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$26.3M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$24.2M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$64.1M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$-48.6M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$36.9M
Gross Margin
KIM
KIM
ZD
ZD
Q1 26
Q4 25
85.9%
Q3 25
85.4%
Q2 25
86.1%
Q1 25
85.6%
Q4 24
87.1%
Q3 24
85.5%
Q2 24
84.4%
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
ZD
ZD
Q1 26
37.2%
Q4 25
36.4%
21.2%
Q3 25
34.9%
7.8%
Q2 25
39.2%
9.5%
Q1 25
33.6%
10.7%
Q4 24
31.7%
19.0%
Q3 24
33.7%
-8.3%
Q2 24
32.1%
8.9%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
ZD
ZD
Q1 26
29.8%
Q4 25
27.9%
0.1%
Q3 25
25.7%
-1.0%
Q2 25
31.0%
7.5%
Q1 25
24.8%
7.4%
Q4 24
31.6%
15.5%
Q3 24
26.8%
-13.7%
Q2 24
23.9%
11.5%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
ZD
ZD
Q1 26
$0.46
Q4 25
$0.06
Q3 25
$-0.09
Q2 25
$0.62
Q1 25
$0.56
Q4 24
$1.53
Q3 24
$-1.11
Q2 24
$0.77

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
ZD
ZD
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$607.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$866.5M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$1.8B
Total Assets
$19.6B
$3.7B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.49×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
ZD
ZD
Q1 26
Q4 25
$211.6M
$607.0M
Q3 25
$159.3M
$503.4M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$457.3M
Q1 25
$131.3M
$431.0M
Q4 24
$688.6M
$505.9M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$386.1M
Q2 24
$126.4M
$687.2M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
ZD
ZD
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.7B
$866.5M
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$8.0B
$864.3M
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
ZD
ZD
Q1 26
$10.4B
Q4 25
$10.4B
$1.8B
Q3 25
$10.5B
$1.8B
Q2 25
$10.5B
$1.8B
Q1 25
$10.6B
$1.8B
Q4 24
$10.7B
$1.8B
Q3 24
$10.5B
$1.8B
Q2 24
$10.6B
$1.9B
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
ZD
ZD
Q1 26
$19.6B
Q4 25
$19.7B
$3.7B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$3.5B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$3.5B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$3.5B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$3.7B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$3.4B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$3.7B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
ZD
ZD
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
0.49×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.75×
0.48×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
ZD
ZD
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$191.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$157.8M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
38.8%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
8.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
516.44×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$287.9M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
ZD
ZD
Q1 26
Q4 25
$258.4M
$191.1M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$138.3M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$57.1M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$20.6M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$158.2M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$106.0M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$50.6M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
ZD
ZD
Q1 26
Q4 25
$157.8M
Q3 25
$108.2M
Q2 25
$26.9M
Q1 25
$205.4M
$-5.0M
Q4 24
$131.1M
Q3 24
$80.1M
Q2 24
$25.1M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
ZD
ZD
Q1 26
Q4 25
38.8%
Q3 25
29.7%
Q2 25
7.6%
Q1 25
38.3%
-1.5%
Q4 24
31.8%
Q3 24
22.7%
Q2 24
7.8%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
ZD
ZD
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.0%
8.2%
Q3 25
0.0%
8.3%
Q2 25
0.0%
8.6%
Q1 25
3.4%
7.8%
Q4 24
6.6%
Q3 24
7.3%
Q2 24
8.0%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
ZD
ZD
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.71×
516.44×
Q3 25
2.41×
Q2 25
1.87×
2.17×
Q1 25
1.69×
0.85×
Q4 24
1.44×
2.47×
Q3 24
2.18×
Q2 24
2.46×
1.37×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

ZD
ZD

Health And Wellness$114.8M28%
Technology And Shopping$108.9M27%
Cybersecurity And Martech Segment$70.9M17%
Connectivity$60.3M15%
Gaming And Entertainment$51.7M13%
Subscription And Licensing$2.9M1%

Related Comparisons