vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and Verisign (VRSN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $425.3M, roughly 1.3× Verisign). Verisign runs the higher net margin — 48.5% vs 29.8%, a 18.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Verisign posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.6% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (5.6% CAGR vs 5.2%).
Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.
Verisign, Inc. is an American company based in Reston, Virginia, that operates a diverse array of network infrastructure, including two of the Internet's thirteen root nameservers, the authoritative registry for the .com, .net, and .name generic top-level domains and the .cc country-code top-level domains, and the back-end systems for the .jobs and .edu sponsored top-level domains.
KIM vs VRSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $558.0M | $425.3M |
| Net Profit | $166.3M | $206.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 88.5% |
| Operating Margin | 37.2% | 67.0% |
| Net Margin | 29.8% | 48.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.0% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 23.7% | 7.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.46 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $558.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $542.5M | $425.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $535.9M | $419.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $525.2M | $409.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.6M | $402.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $525.4M | $395.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $507.6M | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $500.2M | $387.1M |
| Q1 26 | $166.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $151.2M | $206.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.8M | $212.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $163.0M | $207.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.8M | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $166.0M | $191.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.0M | $201.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.7M | $198.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 88.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 88.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 88.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 87.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 87.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 88.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 87.8% |
| Q1 26 | 37.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 36.4% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.9% | 67.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.2% | 68.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.6% | 67.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.7% | 66.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.7% | 68.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.1% | 68.8% |
| Q1 26 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.9% | 48.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.7% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.0% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 49.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.6% | 48.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.8% | 51.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 51.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.46 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $580.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.4B | $-2.2B |
| Total Assets | $19.6B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $211.6M | $580.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.3M | $617.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $226.6M | $593.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.3M | $648.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $688.6M | $599.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $789.0M | $644.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.4M | $689.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $10.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.4B | $-2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5B | $-2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.6B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.7B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.5B | $-1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.6B | $-1.8B |
| Q1 26 | $19.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.5B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $289.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $285.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 67.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $258.4M | $289.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $332.4M | $307.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $305.4M | $202.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.8M | $291.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.5M | $231.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $295.9M | $253.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $294.1M | $160.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $285.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $303.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $194.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $205.4M | $285.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $222.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $247.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $151.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 72.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 47.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.3% | 71.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 56.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 63.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.71× | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.41× | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.87× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.69× | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.44× | 1.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.46× | 0.81× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KIM
| Revenues from rental properties, net | $552.8M | 99% |
| Management and other fee income | $5.2M | 1% |
VRSN
Segment breakdown not available.
